From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E29D3B47E3; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791831843; cv=none; b=rm9S4YNhQAvSjkaTuNN6Veys2yjLMDyi/2hxoj+4quwJvUjRaa0lF0kXLRZdNtxK5rY9dkunSU/ccHolpG3BGcX/aYUq/phTTIKq+T96QGdKH6Riqdfaryjm3lEext3nHGwrxznBMqnhNx+/4atWn69NswNZJTRcGGHhn4riZPU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791831843; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1OMZvB79RqI+kzQxp/CVoXY+jNcNnaUcK+X647D0SSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=juOGH+tf8BzH/M1Ek8ShU+60Vqb9AqnO4jXA+D0RAJIxktz/l2MBKwleNR7ub37vK3gIeqc8ipF+76Sqg0oQV/T2jnMfgFJ3AOHRslbiuW0fnzLdPTN5rcKD97IzPLPK4s4Sb4swIC7cWZygAnPgWJk8HqBkCrP2po1WYFYnC8o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lHkPhq8M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lHkPhq8M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B20BF1F0089B; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:03:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791831842; bh=1OMZvB79RqI+kzQxp/CVoXY+jNcNnaUcK+X647D0SSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lHkPhq8MYEERkEq61elsdCcJ00F8yBEv+2n0x3NF8LgWBeBWKlKNTs0hsVVf3QO7m 6SynsFOO7uH3D2RLbB/7j8QQlob5Wpccl00XMbwo2aXB2fJvevukvTGeKTjOGn1J1Q Gllz52hPXWC5xqJEx2/6dBXha6gHk1W809B4Fej2BWII5I75efTtlHjaxvaSj4v9iQ tgelNi1PS7xPVjNfFS7KNmGoGKxqFrjuDpJhLOes7MkGG9K4jsaBhWuLcJvae9J1L/ j1bZ1h5WtwmHBMKPkY9hE73MrpDspCp5/X2Dqh7/W+VYcC7HB5oRF5kZTtlyA6ml7+ hXuGZJ1U/IW1A== Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:03:57 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Jerome Brunet Cc: Changhuang Liang , Brian Masney , Jerome Brunet , Stephen Boyd , Philipp Zabel , Emil Renner Berthing , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Hal Feng Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Add basic clocks and resets for JHB100 SoC Message-ID: <20261012-grass-guru-1ba876eda895@spud> References: <20261008123338.11081-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> <179180050741.66744.3459927533880490879.b4-review@b4> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FFX0NmdIYzkgk4y3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179180050741.66744.3459927533880490879.b4-review@b4> --FFX0NmdIYzkgk4y3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > The JHB100 SoC includes CRG (Clock and Reset Generator) for multiple > > subsystems: >=20 > Nothing really forces you to send them all together. >=20 > In the future, could you try to send one CRG driver at a time ? >=20 > It is fine to send big RFC to give context but after that, if you > can make you series smaller, it is generally a good idea to do so. >=20 > This helps us iterate on the series faster and then you can fold our > feedback in following series (instead of repeating the same comments > on multiple instances of the same thing) Thanks. >=20 > Also your series does not apply on clk-next or -rc1 and no pre-requisite > are mentioned in this cover letter. Consider using b4 to point out > your pre-requisite if any The dep should be the PR I sent to Brian, but I suspect what's happened here is that the MAINTAINERS parts of those patches (which I had dropped because they were all conflicting with my tree) didn't get reabsorbed into this series. Very annoying for review of course, even if it's a non-functional conflict. Of course rebase on top of clk-next would've highlighted that to the submitter! --FFX0NmdIYzkgk4y3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCas0vHQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0p4KAQC1kQ1+cKFzcpOgn95+wlYJze0mqmVjCR0pb2B6IOdvqQD9HAk4N9AhWxVZ V/yO2UvmUb9rqNSOqVsZ1VhZkGmMAAA= =v6ol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FFX0NmdIYzkgk4y3--