From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: 4ncienth@gmail.com, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] ipv6: serialize address publication with device teardown
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:13:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012151316.GA798355@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179161099408.434549.14449036924552933828@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 05:43:14AM +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue and was not introduced by this patch. The
> recheck above does not cover the window after ipv6_add_addr() returns to
> addrconf_dad_failure().
>
> addrconf_dad_failure() runs from ndisc_recv_ns()/ndisc_recv_na() in
> softirq without RTNL. For IFA_F_STABLE_PRIVACY addresses it does:
>
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_dad_failure() {
> ...
> ifp2 = ipv6_add_addr(idev, &cfg, false, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(ifp2))
> goto lock_errdad;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&ifp2->lock);
> ifp2->stable_privacy_retry = retries;
> ifp2->state = INET6_IFADDR_STATE_PREDAD;
> spin_unlock_bh(&ifp2->lock);
>
> addrconf_mod_dad_work(ifp2, net->ipv6.sysctl.idgen_delay);
> ...
> }
>
> addrconf_ifdown() can run on another CPU because of NETDEV_DOWN,
> disable_ipv6, or NETDEV_CHANGEMTU below IPV6_MIN_MTU. If it snapshots
> addr_list after ifp2 is linked, it can tear ifp2 down completely before
> the spin_lock_bh(&ifp2->lock) above:
>
> CPU1 (addrconf_ifdown)
> ifa->state = INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DEAD;
> __ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_DELADDR, ifa)
> ip6_del_rt(net, ifp->rt, false);
> ifp->rt = NULL;
> list_del_rcu(&ifa->if_list);
> in6_ifa_put(ifa);
>
> CPU2 (addrconf_dad_failure)
> ifp2->state = INET6_IFADDR_STATE_PREDAD;
> addrconf_mod_dad_work(ifp2, ...);
>
> Can CPU2 overwrite the DEAD state here and queue DAD work on an address
> that has already been torn down?
>
> Suppose IF_READY is still set and ifp2 has inherited IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC.
> Then addrconf_dad_work()->addrconf_dad_begin() reaches:
>
> if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC) {
> ip6_ins_rt(net, ifp->rt);
>
> At this point ifp->rt is NULL, and __ip6_ins_rt() dereferences
> rt->fib6_table. IF_READY stays set in two cases:
>
> - the NETDEV_CHANGEMTU path calls addrconf_ifdown(dev, true) without a
> prior NETDEV_DOWN
> - the link comes back up within idgen_delay
>
> Otherwise the address is left in state DAD or POSTDAD. On the final put,
> inet6_ifa_finish_destroy() then hits:
>
> if (ifp->state != INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DEAD) {
> pr_warn("Freeing alive inet6 address %p\n", ifp);
> return;
> }
>
> so the ifaddr is never freed.
>
> addrconf_dad_start() avoids this by checking for DEAD first:
>
> if (ifp->state != INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DEAD) {
> ifp->state = INET6_IFADDR_STATE_PREDAD;
> begin_dad = true;
> }
>
> Would a similar check under ifp2->lock in addrconf_dad_failure() work?
> The PREDAD write itself looks redundant, because ipv6_add_addr() already
> returns the object in state 0 (PREDAD). No later patch in this series
> changes addrconf_dad_failure().
Looks like a valid issue. Please fix in patch #4 in v4 with something
like this:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 7bd0e8820abb..7cb156ddc191 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -2230,7 +2230,6 @@ void addrconf_dad_failure(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
spin_lock_bh(&ifp2->lock);
ifp2->stable_privacy_retry = retries;
- ifp2->state = INET6_IFADDR_STATE_PREDAD;
spin_unlock_bh(&ifp2->lock);
addrconf_mod_dad_work(ifp2, net->ipv6.sysctl.idgen_delay);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 5:40 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ipv6: fix address publication races with addrconf_ifdown Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ipv6: serialize address publication with device teardown Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 15:13 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-10-12 14:53 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ipv6: remove ifaddr from hash during ifdown list cleanup Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ipv6: initialize temporary ifaddr before publication Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 14:52 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-10-09 5:44 ` [PATCH net v3 0/3] ipv6: fix address publication races with addrconf_ifdown netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012151316.GA798355@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®