mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>,
	Avinash Duduskar <avinash.duduskar@gmail.com>,
	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>, Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>,
	Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
	Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>,
	Jingguo Tan <tanjingguo@huawei.com>, Lin Ma <malin89@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/21] bpf: Shrink CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard scope for bpf_tracing_multi_attach()
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 23:40:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012154024.29423-11-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012154024.29423-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

When adding tracing_multi link support for bpf progs, it will use the same
UAPI of the tracing_multi link for kernel functions in
bpf_tracing_multi_attach().

However, the tracing_multi link support for bpf progs does not require
CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS. So, shrink its guard scope to add
new code in bpf_tracing_multi_attach() for the tracing_multi link support
for bpf progs.

To simplify the change, validate CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS only
here, because the execution path in trampoline of the tracing_multi link
support for kernel functions is already guarded with the
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS and
CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS.

Meanwhile, provide a stub of bpf_trampoline_multi_detach() out of the
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS and
CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c  |  5 +++++
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 15 +++------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index e57c687955fd..6e18f69a63ad 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -1867,6 +1867,11 @@ void bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 #undef for_each_mnode_cnt
 #undef for_each_mnode
 
+#else
+
+void bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				 struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link) {}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS &&
 	  CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS &&
 	  CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 195f78db9bda..69559158ab0b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3679,9 +3679,6 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr(const struct bpf_dynptr *dptr
 
 __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS) && \
-    defined(CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS)
-
 static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *tr_link =
@@ -3858,6 +3855,9 @@ int bpf_tracing_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (attr->link_create.flags || attr->link_create.target_fd)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	ids = kvmalloc_objs(*ids, cnt);
 	if (!ids)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3924,12 +3924,3 @@ int bpf_tracing_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *attr)
 	kvfree(link);
 	return err;
 }
-
-#else
-
-int bpf_tracing_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *attr)
-{
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS && CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS */
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 15:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/21] bpf: Initialize ftrace_managed in bpf_trampoline_get() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/21] bpf: Drop unnecessary ftrace_location() in register/unregister/modify_fentry_multi() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_prepare_insns() helper on x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_check_ip() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/21] bpf, x86: Introduce bpf_arch_text_poke_batch() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/21] bpf: Add bpf_text_poke_batch() helper in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/21] bpf: Check tgt_prog before is_tracing_multi_id() in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/21] bpf: Move helpers out of CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/21] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/21] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link fdinfo " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link info " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach failure tests Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog cookie test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog rollback test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog link info test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/21] selftests/bpf: Test tailcall with fentry.multi Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/21] selftests/bpf: Benchmark tracing_multi bpf progs attachment Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261012154024.29423-11-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=avinash.duduskar@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malin89@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rongtao@cestc.cn \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tanjingguo@huawei.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®