mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] overflow: Match arithmetic in both parts of __builtin_choose_expr
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:30:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202610122028.BB0EDC98@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012205919.4012405-1-morbo@google.com>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 08:59:19PM +0000, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The two parts of the '__builtin_choose_expr()' had different arithmetic
> expressions. This patch correct it so that both parts calculate:
> 
>   COUNT * sizeof(*MEMBER) + __must_be_array(MEMBER)
> 
> In practice, the call to '__must_be_array' is meant to assert if
> 'MEMBER' isn't an array and return '0' otherwise. However, symmetry is
> less prone to subtle errors (and far more satisfying).
> 
> Fixes: 230f6fa2c1db ("overflow: Provide constant expression struct_size")

A Fixes trailer implies a bug being solved. What problem is there here?
I only see downsides to this change: this adds even more layers of
macros and inlinings to gain the size_add() for a constant integer 0.

?

> -		size_mul(count, sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member)))
> +		size_add(size_mul(count, sizeof(*(p)->member)),		\
> +			 __must_be_array((p)->member)))

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  3:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 20:59 Bill Wendling
2026-10-13  3:30 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2026-10-13 17:17   ` Bill Wendling
2026-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill Wendling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202610122028.BB0EDC98@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®