mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
To: exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com, dxdt@dev.snart.me, linkinjeon@kernel.org,
	sj1557.seo@samsung.com, Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] exfat: advance valid_size under the folio lock for buffered writes
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:38:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261013033837.2748258-2-chizhiling@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013033837.2748258-1-chizhiling@163.com>

From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>

Buffered writes currently advance valid_size in
exfat_write_iomap_end(), which runs after the folio has been unlocked.
As a result, a folio beyond valid_size can become uptodate and dirty,
and be observed by writeback or reclaim while valid_size still points
to an earlier position.

If reclaim drops such a folio before valid_size covers its range, a
subsequent read treats the range as unwritten and zero-fills it without
reading from disk. When this zero-filled page is later written back,
the zeros overwrite the data that was just written, silently losing
the write even if valid_size has since been advanced.

Advance valid_size from the buffered write path via an iomap
put_folio callback while the folio is still locked. This ensures
valid_size is updated before the folio becomes visible to writeback,
preventing the written data from being lost. Mark the inode dirty
whenever valid_size advances.

Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/exfat/file.c  |  8 ++++++--
 fs/exfat/iomap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 fs/exfat/iomap.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exfat/file.c b/fs/exfat/file.c
index f106db945d8d..dc6df0b73373 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/file.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/file.c
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static ssize_t exfat_fallback_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 	inode_dio_wait(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp));
 
 	written = iomap_file_buffered_write(iocb, from, &exfat_write_iomap_ops,
-			NULL, NULL);
+			&exfat_iomap_write_ops, NULL);
 	if (written < 0)
 		return written;
 
@@ -907,11 +907,15 @@ static ssize_t exfat_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 		 */
 		inode_dio_wait(inode);
 		ret = iomap_file_buffered_write(iocb, iter,
-				&exfat_write_iomap_ops, NULL, NULL);
+				&exfat_write_iomap_ops, &exfat_iomap_write_ops,
+				NULL);
 	}
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto unlock;
 
+	if (exfat_get_valid_size(ei) > valid_size)
+		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+
 	inode_unlock(inode);
 
 	if (iocb->ki_pos > pos) {
diff --git a/fs/exfat/iomap.c b/fs/exfat/iomap.c
index e50ecbfbfbe0..f3816509c6e5 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/iomap.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/iomap.c
@@ -252,6 +252,22 @@ const struct iomap_ops exfat_write_iomap_ops = {
 	.iomap_next	= exfat_write_iomap_next,
 };
 
+static void exfat_iomap_put_folio(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
+		unsigned int copied, struct folio *folio)
+{
+	struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
+
+	if (copied)
+		exfat_advance_valid_size(ei, pos + copied);
+
+	folio_unlock(folio);
+	folio_put(folio);
+}
+
+const struct iomap_write_ops exfat_iomap_write_ops = {
+	.put_folio	= exfat_iomap_put_folio,
+};
+
 /*
  * exfat_writeback_range - Map folio during writeback
  *
diff --git a/fs/exfat/iomap.h b/fs/exfat/iomap.h
index fd8a913f7794..39c93f8cd790 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/iomap.h
+++ b/fs/exfat/iomap.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 extern const struct iomap_dio_ops exfat_write_dio_ops;
 extern const struct iomap_ops exfat_iomap_ops;
 extern const struct iomap_ops exfat_write_iomap_ops;
+extern const struct iomap_write_ops exfat_iomap_write_ops;
 extern const struct iomap_writeback_ops exfat_writeback_ops;
 extern const struct iomap_read_ops exfat_iomap_bio_read_ops;
 
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13  3:38 [PATCH v2 0/7] exfat: fix valid_size update races Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` Chi Zhiling [this message]
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] exfat: advance valid_size while zeroing new ranges Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] exfat: validate cached iomaps during buffered writes Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] exfat: drop i_rwsem from exfat_page_mkwrite Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] exfat: do not re-zero the valid range in exfat_page_mkwrite Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] exfat: complete direct writes synchronously when they update metadata Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  3:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] exfat: publish i_size and valid_size on direct I/O completion Chi Zhiling
2026-10-13  4:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] exfat: fix valid_size update races Namjae Jeon
2026-10-13  6:02   ` Chi Zhiling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261013033837.2748258-2-chizhiling@163.com \
    --to=chizhiling@163.com \
    --cc=Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com \
    --cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=dxdt@dev.snart.me \
    --cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®