From: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com>
To: andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] remoteproc: Merge ti_sci_dev and ti_sci_proc abstraction
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:02:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261014103241.3847-1-sid9.karanam@gmail.com> (raw)
The previous version of the patch had a new header ti_sci_dev.h,
that mirrors ti_sci_proc.h in terms of the struct decl and
its helper function structure, with the goal of abstracting
all ti_sci_handle's members like ti_sci_dev_ops from being
invoked directly in the driver code.
Lore link to the v1 patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260922191453.324983-1-sid9.karanam@gmail.com/
Upon discussing in the original patch thread, it seemed
better to combine ti_sci_proc.h and ti_sci_dev.h's structs
and merge all their helpers into a single header. That is
what ti_sci_ctrl.h aims to do: It has the union of tsd
(ti_sci_dev) and tsp (ti_sci_proc) and both their helper
functions are prefixed with ti_sci_ctrl_dev and
ti_sci_ctrl_proc respectively.
The goal of the patch (v2) is to maintain a single source of origin
for all ti_sci_dev/proc_ops call sites. Any stray calls
to dev_ops/proc_ops function pointer members in driver code should
eventually be abstracted through this header (ti_sci_ctrl.h).
In the future we can try to abstract tsd's dev_ops even further
through pm_runtime, but there are some roadblocks that
I am unaware of, so that warranties a different patch.
Siddharth Karanam (2):
remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
remoteproc: Merge ti_sci_dev and ti_sci_proc abstraction
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 21 +--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 6 +-
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 26 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 23 ++-
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 66 +++-----
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_ctrl.h | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 130 ----------------
7 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_ctrl.h
delete mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 10:32 Siddharth Karanam [this message]
2026-10-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam
2026-10-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: Merge ti_sci_dev and ti_sci_proc abstraction Siddharth Karanam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261014103241.3847-1-sid9.karanam@gmail.com \
--to=sid9.karanam@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®