From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Cc: Li Nan <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>, Xiao Ni <xiao@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] md: clear MD_CLOSING when array_state_store() bails on interrupted lock
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:53:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261014115334.619923-1-jinpu.wang@ionos.com> (raw)
From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Writing "clear", "readonly", "inactive" or "read_auto" to array_state
calls mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev(), which sets MD_CLOSING to
keep the array from being reopened while it is torn down. The flag is
only cleared again at the tail of array_state_store() (for readonly /
read_auto / inactive, or the failed-clear case).
Between setting the flag and reaching that tail there is an early return:
err = mddev_lock(mddev);
if (err)
return err;
mddev_lock() is mutex_lock_interruptible() on reconfig_mutex. If the
writing task catches a signal while blocked there, it returns -EINTR and
MD_CLOSING is left set on a still-running array. do_md_stop() /
md_set_readonly() never ran, so the array keeps working internally, but
every subsequent md_open() now returns -ENODEV for all callers - the
device shows up in /proc/mdstat and sysfs is fully populated, yet cannot
be opened, and cannot be recovered without a reboot (all clear paths
either need the device open or re-enter test_and_set_bit(MD_CLOSING) and
bail with -EBUSY before the clear).
The window is easy to hit on a busy host: reconfig_mutex is held for long
stretches by a running resync/recovery, widening the interruptible wait,
and a userspace helper writing to array_state and then being killed or
timed out is enough to leak the flag.
Route the interrupted-lock exit through a common label so the flag is
released. Guard the clear with a set_closing flag that records whether
this write actually set MD_CLOSING: when mddev->pers is already NULL (for
example a concurrent STOP_ARRAY is mid-teardown) this write skips the
mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev() call above, so it must not clear a
MD_CLOSING that the other thread owns - doing so could let the array be
reopened while it is being destroyed. This also tightens the pre-existing
tail clear, which had the same unconditional behaviour.
mddev_unlock() is correctly skipped on the goto path since the lock was
never acquired.
Fixes: 99b902ac1725 ("md: sync blockdev before stopping raid or setting readonly")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
---
v2: resend, rebased on md-7.4-20261013 (md/md-7.4), no code changes.
drivers/md/md.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 03e35386a802..f6dfd5d76199 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -4671,6 +4671,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
{
int err = 0;
enum array_state st = match_word(buf, array_states);
+ bool set_closing = false;
/* No lock dependent actions */
switch (st) {
@@ -4691,6 +4692,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
err = mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev(mddev, 0);
if (err)
return err;
+ set_closing = true;
break;
default:
break;
@@ -4719,7 +4721,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
}
err = mddev_lock(mddev);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out_clear_closing;
switch (st) {
case inactive:
@@ -4792,8 +4794,17 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
}
mddev_unlock(mddev);
- if (st == readonly || st == read_auto || st == inactive ||
- (err && st == clear))
+out_clear_closing:
+ /*
+ * Only clear MD_CLOSING if this write actually set it. Otherwise a
+ * concurrent teardown (e.g. STOP_ARRAY) may own the flag - this write
+ * would have skipped setting it above when mddev->pers was already
+ * NULL - and clearing it here would let the array be reopened while it
+ * is being destroyed.
+ */
+ if (set_closing &&
+ (st == readonly || st == read_auto || st == inactive ||
+ (err && st == clear)))
clear_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags);
return err ?: len;
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261014115334.619923-1-jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--to=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiao@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®