From: Daejun Park via B4 Relay <devnull+daejun7.park.samsung.com@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:08:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015-xfs-pnfs-batch-v3-7-54fc7b2e467d@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-xfs-pnfs-batch-v3-0-54fc7b2e467d@samsung.com>
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
xfs_fs_map_blocks() flushes and invalidates the page cache of the file
under the iolock and then maps the range, but a write fault takes only
the invalidate lock (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED in __xfs_write_fault()), not
the iolock. A fault on a shared mapping of the file can therefore add a
delalloc extent to the range between the flush and the mapping, which
trips the ASSERT on DELAYSTARTBLOCK, or is handed to nfsd, which warns
about a filesystem that returned a delalloc extent and refuses the
layout.
Take the invalidate lock in exclusive mode together with the iolock, as
__xfs_file_fallocate() does, so that page faults wait until the layout
has been mapped.
Not marked for stable: the race needs a process on the server that
writes to a shared mapping of the file while a client gets a layout for
the same range, and the comment above xfs_break_leased_layouts() already
leaves such writers unsynchronized with pNFS clients.
Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260519145949.GH9555@frogsfrogsfrogs
Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
index 9a578a2d02..3d97b29b54 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
@@ -168,8 +168,11 @@ xfs_fs_map_blocks(
* similar to direct I/O, except that the synchronization is much more
* complicated. See the comment near xfs_break_leased_layouts
* for a detailed explanation.
+ *
+ * Take the invalidate lock as well, so that page faults cannot add
+ * delalloc extents to the range while it is being mapped.
*/
- xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
error = -EINVAL;
limit = mp->m_super->s_maxbytes;
@@ -252,13 +255,13 @@ xfs_fs_map_blocks(
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
}
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
error = xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, iomap, &imap, 0, 0, seq);
*device_generation = mp->m_generation;
return error;
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
return error;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 4:07 [PATCH v3 0/9] xfs: pNFS block layout fixes Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xfs: add a flag to convert unwritten extents without allocating blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xfs: refuse a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT of a range without blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xfs: refuse a direct allocation whose block reservation would wrap Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20261015060942epcas2p4bcb321d2f040673f793404daa724e83c@epcms2p8>
2026-10-15 7:23 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 4:08 ` Daejun Park via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-10-15 6:10 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xfs: add datasync and log_flushed arguments to xfs_log_force_inode() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-15 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xfs: make pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT stable the way fdatasync does Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 6:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015-xfs-pnfs-batch-v3-7-54fc7b2e467d@samsung.com \
--to=devnull+daejun7.park.samsung.com@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®