From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: samarth.colleges@gmail.com
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommupt: report the whole contiguous group in read_and_clear_dirty
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 21:34:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015003412.GA13920@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013165814.3092559-1-samarth.colleges@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 09:58:14AM -0700, samarth.colleges@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Samarth Narang <samarth.colleges@gmail.com>
>
> The record_dirty() function computes the reported dirty length of a contiguous
> (multi-item) leaf group as:
>
> end_index = log2_set_mod_max_t(unsigned int, pts->index, num_contig_lg2);
> end_index = min(end_index, pts->end_index);
> dirty_len = (end_index - index) * log2_to_int(pt_table_item_lg2sz(pts));
>
> Here, log2_set_mod_max_t() sets the low num_contig_lg2 bits of the index to all
> ones, i.e. it returns the *inclusive* last index of the contiguous group.
> However, pts->end_index is an *exclusive* bound, this can be seen from the
> definition of pt_range_to_end_index() which returns of the form "index + 1".
> Also, the iterator stops on index >= end_index. Therefore, subtracting an
> inclusive end from an exclusive bound will yield one less item than the actual
> length of the contiguous group.
>
> For IOMMU dirty tracking used by VFIO/iommufd live migration this silently
> drops the last page of a contiguous dirty mapping from the migration
> bitmap.
>
> This patch makes end_index exclusive to match pts->end_index and the span cleared by
> pt_entry_make_write_clean(). Also, the same length is passed to
> iommu_iotlb_gather_add_range() so this fix would correct that as well.
>
> Fixes: 4a00f9434891 ("iommupt: Add read_and_clear_dirty op")
> Signed-off-by: Samarth Narang <samarth.colleges@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/generic_pt/iommu_pt.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/iommu_pt.h b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/iommu_pt.h
> --- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/iommu_pt.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/iommu_pt.h
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void record_dirty(struct pt_state *pts,
> if (num_contig_lg2 != ilog2(1)) {
> unsigned int index = pts->index;
> unsigned int end_index = log2_set_mod_max_t(
> - unsigned int, pts->index, num_contig_lg2);
> + unsigned int, pts->index, num_contig_lg2) + 1;
This is a bug, but there is a bigger bug here.. The function is
supposed to record the entire entry that is marked as dirty because it
can only clean the entire entry.
Taken with the patch I just commented on this means the system call
should be failing if the entry does not fit within the bitmap.
So this function should look like this:
static void record_dirty(struct pt_state *pts,
struct pt_iommu_dirty_args *dirty)
{
unsigned int lg2sz = pt_entry_oa_lg2sz(pts);
pt_vaddr_t start_va = log2_set_mod(pts->range->va, 0, lg2sz);
pt_vaddr_t dirty_len = log2_to_int(lg2sz);
if (dirty->dirty->bitmap)
iova_bitmap_set(dirty->dirty->bitmap, start_va, dirty_len);
if (!(dirty->flags & IOMMU_DIRTY_NO_CLEAR)) {
/*
* No write log required because DMA incoherence and atomic
* dirty tracking bits can't work together
*/
pt_entry_make_write_clean(pts);
iommu_iotlb_gather_add_range(dirty->dirty->gather, start_va,
dirty_len);
}
}
Along with the patch I just commented on to make iova_bitmap_set
generate a failure if the iova range is not recordable.
I will update this patch in this way
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 16:58 samarth.colleges
2026-10-15 0:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-10-15 0:50 ` Samarth Narang
2026-10-15 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015003412.GA13920@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=samarth.colleges@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®