From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:51:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:49:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202610150045.WoETcMQu-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 0fcb05b72344f40806cbe810de8872f1698bf053
commit: bade44fe546212e142befb69ba22f34944030a99 tracing: Move snapshot code out of trace.c and into trace_snapshot.c
date: 7 months ago
config: hexagon-randconfig-r2110-20261014 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261015/202610150045.WoETcMQu-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e1354f31346666c78d758cee13692ea3b1fe3ec2)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261015/202610150045.WoETcMQu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Fixes: bade44fe5462 ("tracing: Move snapshot code out of trace.c and into trace_snapshot.c")
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202610150045.WoETcMQu-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:51:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
51 | trace_array_puts(tr, "*** SNAPSHOT CALLED FROM NMI CONTEXT ***\n");
| ^
kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:51:3: note: did you mean 'trace_array_put'?
include/linux/trace.h:84:20: note: 'trace_array_put' declared here
84 | static inline void trace_array_put(struct trace_array *tr)
| ^
kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:57:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
57 | trace_array_puts(tr, "*** SNAPSHOT NOT ALLOCATED ***\n");
| ^
kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:64:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
64 | trace_array_puts(tr, "*** BUFFER MEMORY MAPPED ***\n");
| ^
kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:71:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
71 | trace_array_puts(tr, "*** LATENCY TRACER ACTIVE ***\n");
| ^
>> kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:251:6: error: redefinition of 'tracing_snapshot_alloc'
251 | void tracing_snapshot_alloc(void)
| ^
include/linux/trace_printk.h:188:20: note: previous definition is here
188 | static inline void tracing_snapshot_alloc(void) { }
| ^
kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c:1065:3: error: call to undeclared function 'trace_array_puts'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1065 | trace_array_puts(tr, "** Boot snapshot taken **\n");
| ^
6 errors generated.
vim +/trace_array_puts +51 kernel/trace/trace_snapshot.c
36
37
38 static int __init boot_snapshot(char *str)
39 {
40 snapshot_at_boot = true;
41 boot_alloc_snapshot(str);
42 return 1;
43 }
44 __setup("ftrace_boot_snapshot", boot_snapshot);
45 static void tracing_snapshot_instance_cond(struct trace_array *tr,
46 void *cond_data)
47 {
48 unsigned long flags;
49
50 if (in_nmi()) {
> 51 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** SNAPSHOT CALLED FROM NMI CONTEXT ***\n");
52 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** snapshot is being ignored ***\n");
53 return;
54 }
55
56 if (!tr->allocated_snapshot) {
57 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** SNAPSHOT NOT ALLOCATED ***\n");
58 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** stopping trace here! ***\n");
59 tracer_tracing_off(tr);
60 return;
61 }
62
63 if (tr->mapped) {
64 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** BUFFER MEMORY MAPPED ***\n");
65 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** Can not use snapshot (sorry) ***\n");
66 return;
67 }
68
69 /* Note, snapshot can not be used when the tracer uses it */
70 if (tracer_uses_snapshot(tr->current_trace)) {
71 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** LATENCY TRACER ACTIVE ***\n");
72 trace_array_puts(tr, "*** Can not use snapshot (sorry) ***\n");
73 return;
74 }
75
76 local_irq_save(flags);
77 update_max_tr(tr, current, smp_processor_id(), cond_data);
78 local_irq_restore(flags);
79 }
80
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202610150045.WoETcMQu-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®