From: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
To: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ae878000@gmail.com, jacopo.mondi+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: rcar-isp: distinguish absent cores from registration failures
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:56:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015125652.GA3577260@ragnatech.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015004159.2202899-2-mhun512@gmail.com>
Hi Myeonghun,
Thanks for your patch.
On 2026-10-14 20:41:58 -0400, Myeonghun Pak wrote:
> risp_core_probe() clears core->base when resource setup fails. Once
> resource setup has succeeded, it leaves core->base set while unwinding
> errors from the remaining registration steps, including destruction of
> core->rpp and release of the VSPX device reference.
>
> risp_probe() treats every -ENODEV from risp_core_probe() as an absent
> optional core. If a later registration step returns that error, the
> parent probe can continue and subsequently call risp_core_remove() on
> resources that have already been released.
>
> Only accept -ENODEV as an absent core when core->base is NULL. Otherwise,
> propagate the error through the parent probe's subdevice cleanup. This
> also keeps failures from the later IRQ request in the following patch
> from being mistaken for an absent core.
While it would indeed be nice to propagate the error I don't like this
solution. It creates multiple places to check, first the return code of
risp_core_probe() and then implicit variable contents ontop of that.
Would it not be nicer to add an additional return code to
risp_core_probe()? If it returns 0 all good, if it returns -ENODEV the
optional device was not described or a new code (maybe -ENXIO or -EIO ?)
if the device is described but we fail to initialize it.
For this first check return code, then check some other variable
solution,
Nacked-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
>
> This issue was identified during our ongoing research while reviewing
> kernel code.
>
> Fixes: 2151350f60d1 ("media: rcar-isp: Add support for ISPCORE")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Co-developed-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Split the -ENODEV handling out of the IRQ lifetime fix, as requested
> by Niklas Soderlund.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261011214448.2043581-1-mhun512@gmail.com
>
> Compile-tested with Clang 22.1.2, W=1 (arm64). No runtime testing.
>
> drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/csisp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/csisp.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/csisp.c
> index 53ce47020d170454b3d208bce7f4d6aad76764d3..73bf7e42bad2ac1ec2493cd8ec81003cce05a3dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/csisp.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar-isp/csisp.c
> @@ -563,6 +563,8 @@ static int risp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> isp->subdev.internal_ops = &risp_cs_internal_ops;
> break;
> case -ENODEV:
> + if (isp->core.base)
> + goto error_subdev;
> /* The device don't have an ISP core, that is OK. */
> ret = 0;
> break;
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 0:41 [PATCH v2 0/2] media: rcar-isp: fix core registration and IRQ lifetime Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-15 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] media: rcar-isp: distinguish absent cores from registration failures Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-15 12:56 ` Niklas Söderlund [this message]
2026-10-15 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] media: rcar-isp: release the core interrupt before destroying RPPX1 Myeonghun Pak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015125652.GA3577260@ragnatech.se \
--to=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=ae878000@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jacopo.mondi+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®