From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf, sockmap: Restrict iter-context sockmap updates to iter/sockmap
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 23:09:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016-sockmap-update-limit-iter-v1-2-23fa946db59e@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016-sockmap-update-limit-iter-v1-0-23fa946db59e@rbox.co>
Among iterators, allow only iter/sockmap to update sockmaps and sockhashes.
Previously, any BPF_TRACE_ITER program could perform these updates, which
caused locking issues in specific scenarios [1][2][3]. This tightening is
part of the broader effort to lock down the BPF API [4].
env->prog->type check covers the BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT case. Without it, a
non-sockmap iterator, e.g. iter/unix, could call a function named
bpf_iter_sockmap() that has been freplace'd with sockmap-update logic, and
still pass the check.
[1]: commit 4d328dd69538 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock")
[2]: commit 64c2f93fc325 ("bpf, sockmap: Take state lock for af_unix iter")
[3]: https://msgid.link/87echn2fhd.fsf@cloudflare.com
[4]: https://msgid.link/akRZ_e7DJh2aP-2i@john-p8
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://msgid.link/20260626205814.BAC3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ddfa0c6d2755..c63abb13ec6d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10331,6 +10331,7 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id)
{
enum bpf_attach_type eatype = env->prog->expected_attach_type;
enum bpf_prog_type type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
+ const char *afname = env->prog->aux->attach_func_name;
if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem &&
func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem)
@@ -10341,7 +10342,12 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id)
*/
switch (type) {
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
- if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_ITER)
+ /* iter/sockmap only; type check rejects a freplace of any
+ * iterator's bpf_iter_sockmap() subprog.
+ */
+ if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_ITER &&
+ env->prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+ !strcmp(afname + strlen(BPF_ITER_FUNC_PREFIX), "sockmap"))
return true;
break;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS:
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 21:09 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf, sockmap: Restrict iter-context sockmap updates to sockmap iterators Michal Luczaj
2026-10-16 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Remove sockmap update from bpf_iter_unix Michal Luczaj
2026-10-16 21:09 ` Michal Luczaj [this message]
2026-10-16 23:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf, sockmap: Restrict iter-context sockmap updates to iter/sockmap Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add negative test for sockmap update from non-sockmap iter Michal Luczaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016-sockmap-update-limit-iter-v1-2-23fa946db59e@rbox.co \
--to=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®