From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5028F3E7BA7 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792143462; cv=none; b=dRRrCy6mk6kXJgkgZovcUtO8i82lzkS04NCYpkyMBLBcgSJtfBaZmHytiQRlF8WxewGnqTwqlWmzyDdWpZk5vjYBf79NLELyz0NZDQ2VzF2KXqSeHBsWasGfkU3mCx7XByJ6mcb4XyFdCRM6Cw5zJKov8aqI99pntLgFgaahz6I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792143462; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EULeSIJ8HNnMPsQZ4YnhJWYAbD8Oae+53dQmmt9inXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lNQt22KuQIwJk7lXDCAsYGAjaq52IOfqpuxNWlta+kaHOsa+FlvaBQfr+FeEA3qXz1rGeg5lFkToiwFAGejglE37OwJqlWmkJpNChgzSUA60dEE8Hgyp5UupPDhPL4RSkOmkJnVy4ia/voDZ76GgjHOgOk3G3REInO3w8rOFffs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=XqxYI4DH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=XF1gTa2R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XqxYI4DH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XF1gTa2R" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1792143460; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jEPuNhSxsbUvh+PW3O30AyJYlH++sXV5pTbl3odzk7E=; b=XqxYI4DH8gD1zWiiceV4GYWN5vqXxNZW3MUaeoAksja61e1oxNvvYh6l/elkWy0ibMlQ6T KEIJkh4h9f7sYd3hbQCHiFvhc8MRN/YzBipqt6dtldGydlkQYTyK//JQKOhILjaHnfh5Nn m/ZTCjAI6Ir49oiY6GTDQyojRxrKbNs= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-643-QbclsYnrPI6OE63aMOXjEg-1; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:37:38 +0000 X-MC-Unique: QbclsYnrPI6OE63aMOXjEg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: QbclsYnrPI6OE63aMOXjEg_1792143457 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48af4046a3bso4804652f8f.2 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1792143457; x=1792748257; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=jEPuNhSxsbUvh+PW3O30AyJYlH++sXV5pTbl3odzk7E=; b=XF1gTa2RYtdJpEtCz1OgikGIv9mHWIji0efsJp1BHn0QovQjLn2TAst/VPl2v3JjgS yOnvZPQU9GA3m2K+4NFCZoOQgGF4JSrsFLQGMvxYjb3VK+HEU9f5LmFlUY0HHsEJqpnV CvekaMGy7I6W1iOvMzk3sG1YUM2bvd0OX7aChd9FseJMPRQIJXiM1jf5Ci2UzZa4uMn5 p4zsTNo4Yg8+yz71gbX4PuZiPQ3pGKxtki4CMJFn1CS0NtXMLmc+zQ6YvUAqX0wP8cV5 QsUQfyWxtRMI6N6YjRUEBcqN3XbU1Z8MvWvt/jMPqXZiS08ALM8Wp2CYNthkZOTfXL2x 65KQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792143457; x=1792748257; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=jEPuNhSxsbUvh+PW3O30AyJYlH++sXV5pTbl3odzk7E=; b=W3s8YGsvxehqbuwTqgXyf4CsFejfgJR7b1DXkiqAOvXrizjsLRLF2ZbJM70IP8Znlr wjBbzKdwRIGoXrwYaDUF7v4W3+PNOfLcByQEPgUBGztQxywvhQ25aZSIiF+lOC9cxdUm nghzzgwg2QOh+mktNT5C60i4iGBRjeTj6hCv0hNlloiRskEnV2H03ftfhstGBkuTs7uj MvW+e4HtcM5v2Xu90BiDEO7yRrZH5DSlOxeynt8caRdc84VfXV12Oi0iOlCeGMDK65Cd CPffmvx7AAWt6E3XncHE0IDxVhjs8OH6FmwRWBrm9CvJbqVuzuDV+JzalYVw3xmA6MHx kb1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYKlMSfRgrlyuayFAjXsVFyrV+RbP2/hZElAdjrHgcA4yoZe3yjV hoaNUKgaqGG+12a9InYqjGsPj/0wluXO1HgG1rAGMAC93K3gMqNzlfqILk/fCv5QYzVTvvLOgox 8Ls3te55np4QTKr8wEAl9LBxdmxWff9fZuOb1CvvXumZ+zIiXdGVSJhDZc41EsFOGUA== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1lYLKAlJ21t0ngYr6CxTdGxDIzUUoX+c98SbcWLKt7OtdLThCnQjtVbimoacL D47vv9GzM2OAE27hy4A72mKQJ9P8Cm5393cya2GkCIbpDhKmzt70WojyIE3XAM0l9Xd8iUXsgIQ mkYgsT/ErJZgGDsXXGh8xkxamdHnjOzStvEe4cnpB39lYVNqkuwUdeFbJ64niVFAfqoi21NyD0n 5gVmwPblraadj76I1M7J0O1MIj4BzUHSL4vW315bIBLz+u535OcyBxWm3bTuZiTxdvyj5m+2DMa gfzSpNNuhw4zVi5Kx8tY9UMdASs+cDaq0mNIVmZFfot9AL43tPztDb6ALOmHxZeb7o3DCA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64e3:0:b0:48d:fd48:86c0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48dfd48878dmr4550986f8f.47.1792143457347; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:37:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64e3:0:b0:48d:fd48:86c0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48dfd48878dmr4550928f8f.47.1792143456859; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2a0d:6fc0:3fd7:5300:3d6b:52a4:a23f:9d0b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-48dfd5008e7sm3899434f8f.43.2026.10.16.02.37.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:37:32 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Xuan Zhuo , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Rusty Russell , Max Krasnyansky , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , linux-um@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] um: vector: honor virtio net hdr conversion failures Message-ID: <20261016053633-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <6716834884238de0ab1ab313004044122aa2adbf.1792067836.git.mst@redhat.com> <8420ba1fe84fc7d105825026802d4ad10d44af71.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20261015085119-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <64ee40b97fc447bbf3abb80250ad0d9f3cf3c6fa.camel@sipsolutions.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64ee40b97fc447bbf3abb80250ad0d9f3cf3c6fa.camel@sipsolutions.net> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 02:55:23PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 08:52 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 02:47:01PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 08:41 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() refuses packets whose checksum metadata > > > > it cannot make sense of, but the vector raw transport ignored > > > > its return value: rejected packets went on into the stack with > > > > their metadata unvalidated. > > > > > > > > Propagate the failure. > > > > > > > > Assisted-by: LLM > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > --- > > > > arch/um/drivers/vector_transports.c | 4 +++- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/vector_transports.c b/arch/um/drivers/vector_transports.c > > > > index e1fb2a76fdff..8b7548458663 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/um/drivers/vector_transports.c > > > > +++ b/arch/um/drivers/vector_transports.c > > > > @@ -210,7 +210,9 @@ static int raw_verify_header( > > > > return 1; > > > > > > > > skb_set_network_header(skb, ETH_HLEN); > > > > - virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, vheader, virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()); > > > > + if (virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, vheader, > > > > + virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()) < 0) > > > > + return -1; > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > Seems it'd be simpler to just > > > > > > return virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(...); > > > > > > As far as I can tell, the function only returns -EINVAL or 0 (never a > > > positive value), and the caller only cares about negative (error) or > > > positive (no checksum needed), so that'd be equivalent? > > > > > > johannes > > > > if raw_verify_header can safely return any errno - i did not want to > > audit it. > > You already used an LLM and still didn't want to? ;-) I don't really trust it to do code audits especially in code I do not test. > I checked briefly (by hand) and it seems fine, it's assigned to the > function pointer, which only has two callers on the _kern.c side. > > johannes Thanks, will make the change. -- MST