[PATCH 6/7] powerpc/numa: Extract CPU associativity processing into separate function

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>]

Move the CPU associativity processing loop from parse_numa_properties()
into a dedicated process_cpu_associativity() function. This improves code
organization by separating concerns:

- parse_numa_properties() handles overall NUMA initialization
- process_cpu_associativity() focuses on CPU associativity processing

This also allows CPU associativity processing to be invoked again after
the processor sharing mode is known.

No functional change in the initialization flow.

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index c2aefb60ed5a..fde79f34340e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -918,44 +918,18 @@ static int detect_and_enable_coregroup(const __be32 *associativity, int index)
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
+static void process_cpu_associativity(void)
 {
 	bool vphn = firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_VPHN);
-	struct device_node *memory, *pci;
-	int default_nid = 0, index = 0;
-	const __be32 *associativity;
 	unsigned long i;
+	int index = 0;
 
-	primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index();
-
-	if (primary_domain_index < 0) {
-		/*
-		 * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree
-		 * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled.
-		 */
-		numa_enabled = false;
-		return primary_domain_index;
-	}
-
-	pr_debug("associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", primary_domain_index);
-
-	/*
-	 * If it is FORM2 initialize the distance table here.
-	 */
-	if (affinity_form == FORM2_AFFINITY)
-		initialize_form2_numa_distance_lookup_table();
-
-	/*
-	 * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
-	 * init, we need to know the node ids now. This is because
-	 * each node to be onlined must have NODE_DATA etc backing it.
-	 */
 	for_each_present_cpu(i) {
+		const __be32 *associativity = NULL;
 		__be32 vphn_assoc[VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE];
 		struct device_node *cpu = NULL;
 		int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 
-		associativity = NULL;
 		if (vphn) {
 			memset(vphn_assoc, 0, VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE * sizeof(__be32));
 			if (vphn_get_associativity(i, vphn_assoc) == 0)
@@ -984,6 +958,39 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
 		if (likely(nid >= 0) && numa_enabled)
 			node_set_online(nid);
 	}
+}
+
+static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *memory, *pci;
+	int default_nid = 0;
+	const __be32 *associativity;
+
+	primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index();
+
+	if (primary_domain_index < 0) {
+		/*
+		 * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree
+		 * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled.
+		 */
+		numa_enabled = false;
+		return primary_domain_index;
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", primary_domain_index);
+
+	/*
+	 * If it is FORM2 initialize the distance table here.
+	 */
+	if (affinity_form == FORM2_AFFINITY)
+		initialize_form2_numa_distance_lookup_table();
+
+	/*
+	 * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
+	 * init, we need to know the node ids now. This is because
+	 * each node to be onlined must have NODE_DATA etc backing it.
+	 */
+	process_cpu_associativity();
 
 	if (numa_enabled == 0) {
 		pr_warn("disabled by user\n");
-- 
2.47.1