From: Joonhoe Kim <26rote@gmail.com>
To: Arpit Saini <arpit.saini@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mahadevan.p@oss.qualcomm.com, rajeevny@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: fix AHB clock staying enabled across suspend
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:50:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016125036.1069-1-26rote@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006-dsi-ahb-clk-suspend-fix-v1-1-67da848e1b0a@oss.qualcomm.com>
(Resending with the lists on Cc; my earlier reply only went to Arpit.)
On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 06:43:53PM +0530, Arpit Saini wrote:
> pm_clk_suspend()/resume() only call clk_disable()/clk_enable() for the
> AHB ("iface") clock, never clk_unprepare(), so prepare_count never
> reaches 0. The clock (and its source) stays reported as enabled
> through s2idle suspend even though the display stack is fully
> suspended:
I looked at this on a Lenovo Legion Tab Y700 Gen 5 (SM8850, bonded DSI,
v7.3-rc4), comparing the current code, this patch's approach, and
preparing the clock only in the PHY runtime callbacks.
In s2idle with the display on I see no difference: in all three cases
both PHYs are already runtime suspended at system suspend,
disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk has enable_count 0, and CX collapse during a 100 s
s2idle is the same. Is the clock really enabled during suspend on your
board, or only prepared? Reading clk_summary runtime-resumes the clock
controllers, so it can show a different state.
The difference here is with the display off and the system awake: with
the clock prepared from probe (current code and this patch), dispcc
stays runtime active and MMCX stays on. Preparing it in the runtime
callbacks lets both go off. I have not measured the power difference.
That variant survived 30 DPMS off/on cycles with clk_summary read in a
loop. Did you hit the prepare_lock deadlock, or is it from code
reading?
Thanks,
Joonhoe Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 13:13 Arpit Saini
2026-10-08 23:58 ` Alexey Minnekhanov
2026-10-14 6:08 ` Arpit Saini
2026-10-16 12:50 ` Joonhoe Kim [this message]
2026-10-17 18:16 ` Arpit Saini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016125036.1069-1-26rote@gmail.com \
--to=26rote@gmail.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=arpit.saini@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=mahadevan.p@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=rajeevny@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®