mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Ömer Mete Kaya" <omermetekaya0@gmail.com>,
	oneukum@suse.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	syzbot+04cd90bb99c6ef81a65d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Documentation: Update description of completion callback context
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:56:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016185600.yZTtGfHF@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7494e770-518f-4866-87e2-5a525af3b82e@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 2026-10-15 14:35:56 [-0400], Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 08:26:43PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2026-10-15 12:00:46 [-0400], Alan Stern wrote:
> > > The existing kerneldoc documentation for URB completion callbacks is
> > > incorrect about the context in which the callbacks occur; it is not
> > > always in_interrupt.  State explicitly that a callback may occur in
> > > any context with no guarantees, and likewise for the status of
> > > CPU-local interrupts.
> > > 
> > > Documentation update only; no code changes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > 
> > usb_hcd_giveback_urb() kernel doc says: 
> > 
> > |  * Context: atomic. The completion callback is invoked either in a work queue
> > |  * (BH) context or in the caller's context, depending on whether the HCD_BH
> > |  * flag is set in the @hcd structure, except that URBs submitted to the
> > |  * root hub always complete in BH context.
> > 
> > Do you think this deserves an update?
> 
> I think that's okay as is.  It describes the current implementation 
> pretty well, even though it doesn't mention the lack of guarantees.  If 
> you feel it should be changed, let me know.

It reads as it is always atomic. Maybe removing parts of the description
and adding a pointer to your initial documentation would be better.

> Alan Stern

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 21:59 [PATCH net v6] usbnet: fix smp_processor_id() use in preemptible context Ömer Mete Kaya
2026-10-08  3:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-08 14:16   ` Alan Stern
2026-10-08 16:43     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-08 18:03       ` Alan Stern
2026-10-09 11:31         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-12 19:49           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-12 20:26             ` Alan Stern
2026-10-12 21:25               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-13  2:09                 ` Alan Stern
2026-10-13  9:11                   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-13  9:22                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-14 19:11                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-14 19:22                     ` Alan Stern
2026-10-14 22:04                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-15 16:00                         ` [PATCH] USB: Documentation: Update description of completion callback context Alan Stern
2026-10-15 18:26                           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-15 18:35                             ` Alan Stern
2026-10-16 18:56                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-10-13  8:54               ` [PATCH net v6] usbnet: fix smp_processor_id() use in preemptible context Oliver Neukum
2026-10-13  9:20                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-16 15:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261016185600.yZTtGfHF@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omermetekaya0@gmail.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=syzbot+04cd90bb99c6ef81a65d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®