mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liz Fong-Jones <lizf@honeycomb.io>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Patrick Lu (Anthropic)" <perf.patrick.lu@gmail.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ian@honeycomb.io, Liz Fong-Jones <lizf@honeycomb.io>
Subject: [PATCH v2] writeback: keep cleanup_offline_cgwb()'s scan out of syncs
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 04:07:11 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261017040710.1174009-1-lizf@honeycomb.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015114307.1041273-1-lizf@honeycomb.io>

On a filesystem mounted with lazytime, sync() and syncfs() can return
without persisting timestamp updates of inodes attached to a dying
cgroup wb, so a crash after the sync loses them. File data and sizes are
not affected.

Since commit f6988c90671e ("writeback: bound cleanup_offline_cgwb()
rescans by rotating scanned inodes"), isw_prepare_wbs_switch() moves the
inodes it walks to the newest end of the list. When a pass fills its isw
before reaching an inode that got its lazytime update after a sync's
cutoff, the walked inodes land past it on b_dirty_time, and the sync's
queue_io(), which stops at the first inode dirtied after the cutoff,
misses them. The late inode has to be one without a pending lazytime
update; one already on b_dirty_time keeps its position.

The window is narrow. cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() skips wbs with
anything on b_dirty, b_io or b_more_io, so the scan has to land between
wb_writeback() fixing dirtied_before and taking list_lock for its first
queue_io(), unless a multi-pass drain started before the wb got dirty
IO.

Take wb_switch_rwsem for read across the scan, as
process_inode_switch_wbs() does for the switches.

Fixes: f6988c90671e ("writeback: bound cleanup_offline_cgwb() rescans by rotating scanned inodes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0bc5d58533f10b4841807be3025daa11@kernel.org/
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 checkpatch
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5-1
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Liz Fong-Jones <lizf@honeycomb.io>
---
Changes in v2, all from Tejun's review:
- Correct the trigger and the reordering description, and note how
  narrow the window is
- Reword the code comment
- Move the test details here and trim the description

Test, with a debug-only delay holding a syncfs's work on the wb between
its cutoff and queue_io() to widen the window: 300 files on a cgroup's
wb with lazytime atime updates, one more read after the cutoff, then
the cgroup removed so the cleanup ran. Without this patch, syncfs()
queued 48 of the 300 and after a crash 252 atime updates were lost, on
ext4 (-I 4096, so neighbours' timestamps are not written along) in 3 of
3 runs and on XFS in 1 of 1; with it, none were lost. arm64 KVM guests,
7.3-rc7.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261015114307.1041273-1-lizf@honeycomb.io/

 fs/fs-writeback.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index ea3eb40bf828..372ac9785e03 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -789,6 +789,13 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 		new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
 
 	nr = 0;
+	/*
+	 * The scan moves walked inodes to the newest end of b_dirty_time,
+	 * past ones it didn't reach. If one of those was dirtied after a
+	 * sync's cutoff, the sync's queue_io() stops there and misses the
+	 * moved ones. Exclude syncs as process_inode_switch_wbs() does.
+	 */
+	down_read(&wb->bdi->wb_switch_rwsem);
 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	/*
 	 * In addition to the inodes that have completed writeback, also switch
@@ -803,6 +810,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 		restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty_time,
 						 &nr);
 	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+	up_read(&wb->bdi->wb_switch_rwsem);
 
 	/* no attached inodes? bail out */
 	if (nr == 0) {

base-commit: 24a19b953e2a3d0ea5a8c4951a0ab8f32720c907
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-17  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-15 11:43 [PATCH] " Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-16 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-17  4:07 ` Liz Fong-Jones [this message]
2026-10-17 18:39   ` [PATCH v2] " Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 23:26   ` Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-19 10:08   ` Jan Kara
2026-10-21 10:30   ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261017040710.1174009-1-lizf@honeycomb.io \
    --to=lizf@honeycomb.io \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ian@honeycomb.io \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=perf.patrick.lu@gmail.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®