From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Queue the kick_sync wait from set_next_task_scx()
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 18:24:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261018162415.55913-1-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
The SCX_KICK_WAIT wait is deferred to rq->scx.kick_sync_bal_cb, which a
final pick queues on the local rq. Under core scheduling, a pick that
returns a task isn't final: pick_next_task() goes on to pick the SMT
siblings, and their dispatch can release the shared rq lock with the
callback still queued. A CPU acquiring the rq lock in that window then
finds a pending balance callback and triggers the warning in
rq_pin_lock().
Fix this by queuing the callback from set_next_task_scx() on SNT_PICK
and SNT_REPICK. put_prev_set_next_task() calls it once the pick is
final, after the core-wide selection, so the rq lock can't be dropped
with the callback queued. If the CPU ends up running idle or a higher
class task, no SCX task runs there and there's nothing to wait for:
kick_sync_pending stays set and the next pick of an SCX task waits
before running it.
Also, proxy exec zaps the balance callbacks and picks again when
find_proxy_task() fails, so clear kick_sync_pending when the callback
runs rather than when it's queued.
Fixes: 415cb193bb97 ("sched_ext: Fix SCX_KICK_WAIT deadlock by deferring wait to balance callback")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.0+: c72945693b90: sched: Restart fair hrtick after same-task repicks
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.0+
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Queue the kick_sync wait from set_next_task_scx() on SNT_PICK and
SNT_REPICK, once the pick is final, instead of taking it off the local
rq around each dispatch of a core-wide selection (Tejun Heo)
- Clear kick_sync_pending when the callback runs rather than when it's
queued, since proxy exec can zap the balance callbacks (Tejun Heo)
- Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261017202025.3834954-3-arighi@nvidia.com
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index aa00b75371822..e975e1086e7bc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -3418,6 +3418,8 @@ static void scx_start_task_running(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_RUN_TRACKED;
}
+static void kick_sync_wait_bal_cb(struct rq *rq);
+
static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, enum snt_e type)
{
bool first = type == SNT_PICK;
@@ -3433,6 +3435,20 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, enum snt_e t
(type == SNT_PICK || type == SNT_REPICK))
rq->scx.flags |= SCX_RQ_PROXY_PENDING;
+ /*
+ * Defer the kick_sync wait to a balance callback which can drop rq lock
+ * and enable IRQs. Waiting directly in the pick path would deadlock
+ * against CPUs sending us IPIs (e.g., TLB flushes) while we wait for
+ * them.
+ *
+ * Queue it only once the pick is final, so that the rq lock can't be
+ * released with the callback queued (e.g., by another dispatch during
+ * a core-wide selection). If no SCX task gets picked, there's nothing
+ * to wait for and kick_sync_pending stays set for the next SCX pick.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rq->scx.kick_sync_pending) && (type == SNT_PICK || type == SNT_REPICK))
+ queue_balance_callback(rq, &rq->scx.kick_sync_bal_cb, kick_sync_wait_bal_cb);
+
if (type == SNT_REPICK)
return;
@@ -3713,17 +3729,22 @@ static void kick_sync_wait_bal_cb(struct rq *rq)
s32 cpu;
/*
- * This callback is queued and normally flushed within @rq's own
- * scheduling pass. However, dispatch can drop the rq lock while it sits
- * queued, and lock takers in that window (the sched class change paths,
- * the scx task iterator) flush pending balance callbacks on release,
- * running this one on a foreign CPU whose snapshots are unrelated. The
- * kicked CPUs are already on their way to advance the kick_syncs being
- * waited on. Don't get in the way.
+ * This callback is queued once the pick is final and flushed within
+ * @rq's own scheduling pass. If a lock taker on a foreign CPU ever
+ * flushes it, the snapshots are unrelated to that CPU. Don't get in the
+ * way and leave the wait pending for @rq's next pick.
*/
if (unlikely(cpu_of(rq) != smp_processor_id()))
return;
+ /*
+ * Clear only when the wait actually runs. The callback can be dropped
+ * without running (e.g., proxy exec zaps the balance callbacks and
+ * picks again when find_proxy_task() fails), in which case the next
+ * pick must queue it again.
+ */
+ rq->scx.kick_sync_pending = false;
+
ks = __this_cpu_read(scx_kick_syncs);
ksyncs = rcu_dereference_sched(ks)->syncs;
@@ -3922,25 +3943,12 @@ do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
* NULL pick from the dl_server, the core continues picking and can
* release the rq lock (e.g., prev_balance() or another dispatch). In
* that case, run the deferred work from irq_work, which doesn't depend
- * on the current rq lock section, and leave the kick sync wait pending
- * for the next pick.
+ * on the current rq lock section.
*/
if (p != RETRY_TASK && (p || !force_scx)) {
/* under core scheduling, see dispatch_core_pick() */
if (!core_sched)
maybe_queue_balance_callback(rq);
-
- /*
- * Defer to a balance callback which can drop rq lock and enable
- * IRQs. Waiting directly in the pick path would deadlock against
- * CPUs sending us IPIs (e.g., TLB flushes) while we wait for
- * them.
- */
- if (unlikely(rq->scx.kick_sync_pending)) {
- rq->scx.kick_sync_pending = false;
- queue_balance_callback(rq, &rq->scx.kick_sync_bal_cb,
- kick_sync_wait_bal_cb);
- }
} else if (!core_sched && (rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_CB_PENDING)) {
rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_BAL_CB_PENDING;
schedule_deferred(rq);
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 16:24 Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-10-20 0:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261018162415.55913-1-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®