From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Haoran Wang <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>,
jasowangio@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
eperezma@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] vhost/vringh: __get_user without access_ok leaks kernel memory via vDPA passthrough
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:43:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261018174250-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiUn9EbV4TJ4J7OPY0fVc3UC+xb-pp=+rg3hRc4jQqihg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 10:34:12AM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 at 09:26, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > + __virtio16 __user *uaddr = ivec.iov.iovec[0].iov_base;
> > +
> > + if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(*p)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + ret = __get_user(tmp, uaddr);
>
> You should never use __get_user() in the first place. It is almost
> always just a bug.
Right, I was thinking of some other code. This one should just be
get_user.
> And __get_user() together with access_ok() is actively wrong and
> stupid. It's slower, bigger, and more bug-prone than just using
> "get_user()".
>
> The *only* reason ever to use __get_user() is in very very iffy code
> that might use a kernel pointer and doesn't want the access_ok() code.
>
> Or old legacy code from the last century when __get_user() was faster
> and was inlined.
>
> Linus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 7:23 Haoran Wang
2026-10-15 7:42 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2026-10-17 21:59 ` David Laight
2026-10-18 19:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-18 19:48 ` David Laight
2026-10-18 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-18 21:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wjneFJ7XmZ6ux-LsHq4apDgANcKfERztmAG9sGVY_TxAg@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-18 22:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-18 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-10-18 20:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-10-18 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-10-18 21:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-18 21:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261018174250-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=haoranwangsec@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®