From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com>
Cc: nathan@kernel.org, nsc@kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] elf-parse: validate what the host ELF tools read from the file
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:57:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019085754.1fcadee6@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019000218.3977398-1-lzsx618@gmail.com>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 19:02:13 -0500
Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com> wrote:
> scripts/elf-parse.c takes the section header table, the section indices and
> the symbol table straight out of the file it maps, without checking any of
> them against the mapping. All three users -- kallsyms, sorttable and
> tracepoint-update -- then index with those values, so a truncated or
> corrupted object file makes the tools read outside the mapping, allocate
> from a file-supplied count, or divide by zero instead of printing an error.
>
> These are build-time tools fed by the local toolchain, so under
> Documentation/process/threat-model.rst this looks like a robustness problem
> rather than a vulnerability: reaching it takes a corrupt or hostile object
> in the build tree. I am leaving that classification for you to review.
Definitely not a security threat here. If the object files are corrupted,
then this is not where you should be detecting it. Unless we change the
purpose of this tool as a corruption detector, this code *expects* the
input to not be corrupt. The reasons for checking various ELF header info
is if someone is porting this code to a new architecture where it doesn't
support it yet, we want to warn.
I'm fine with adding robustness, but not complexity for an issue that
should never exist.
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 0:02 Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 0:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] elf-parse: avoid an undefined shift when checking the ELF type Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-10-19 0:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] elf-parse: check that the section header table is inside the file Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 12:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-10-19 0:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] elf-parse: check the section indices that elf_open_ro() takes from " Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 0:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] elf-parse: check the symbol table before walking it Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 0:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] elf-parse: bound symbol names by the string table Leizhen Zhang
2026-10-19 12:57 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261019085754.1fcadee6@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lzsx618@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®