From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA784229B0; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792406137; cv=none; b=OQrG2RUCnMuyg2TbCwJF5oPFh7+y0hsB422RjIh1fIosHPLW3z4eaLTqLADNk29VsW4ds5NImoATSORWNX4AXYPP5Hx2qDIAsnKA4L5wSa2DUSUGmVXiUe1yozz60pRPfxX1jnc6plSN2U2fdtMVQXnjQg9L+JHj1xGxbhljDs8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792406137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/qPA3C4H5PUQHsTJAGP/5s8JPIpsvgJCg8DwidnZRuU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=b6FO368XHZo8FH/ikg1n/2rp7DQM54CfG6TjyHT+ObLYBTBcLmGThodDyhYG6eNnHTi89ubfv6Fas0Djd4qDU37bT/os9ZdXhGmJuibJ9zRuS0wGDh6vpIZIE8Y79W4TdpbUQuxxYGrNeKHIt4OAUJguWkB+EYauXbZDRLpgn8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=cPYHmpMf; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=4CA/APUp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="cPYHmpMf"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="4CA/APUp" Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:35:32 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1792406134; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zfTi3yjEfNeN/+5NinRk7/mJpdjzJqaaCcknZu1jXLg=; b=cPYHmpMfVZWO4UA1lTua0HDXPiCkHyb0NG30WauRpdgOJgOVGTLlMm9EOoDiFlR9OgZJrB 2mTtyyU/zV5lb8tCfvCXGB81NsBizg8iYzrewJQ25KsKce/FOh/FMBDpdXtXdwmAhlg+nJ IsTMCOs3q8FaPC9HXcABUkIGCTq0Owrz4zGqiaW+24u7EDexNY6kqAdEGPnJm1tqfQmK43 hPS0xmYKBrw0iKmHojU4foxIGi6621GC+KXATWdC5xtyxxHFfZIuvAwwvzQXTfaPumg4FP zaIXYKnzB7TvwaosSxVi0VwiUu7BwrgJA9nKHboTz4BSwSrMbjyah+TmekYqCA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1792406134; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zfTi3yjEfNeN/+5NinRk7/mJpdjzJqaaCcknZu1jXLg=; b=4CA/APUp1fHmdx9bDhaeb+DvLBh0vaFlmYBS1D4DBE7PjzuE21R42Hs3ehJEUpIvJFyEwA DjBrLFWOE3hrhuAg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Bill Wendling , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Jonathan Corbet , Justin Stitt , Nathan Chancellor , Neal Gompa , Nick Desaulniers , Richard Purdie , Sam James , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Tomas Glozar , Willy Tarreau , x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Start removing X86_X32_ABI Message-ID: <20261019103532.E7ra8pya@linutronix.de> References: <20261015-x32_removal-v5-0-2bfef9151fad@linutronix.de> <2fcf2983-0972-427b-ad05-b403e325ce40@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fcf2983-0972-427b-ad05-b403e325ce40@linuxfoundation.org> On 2026-10-15 13:47:37 [-0600], Shuah Khan wrote: > For selftests: > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan Thank you. > Do you plan to cleanup x32 checks from selftests/x86 Makefiles? Could you please give me an example? I've been looking through tools/testing/selftests/x86 and didn't find anything Makefile + x32 related. Just syscall_numbering.c which has x32 bits. > thanks, > -- Shuah Sebastian