From: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: annotate lockless task ioprio accesses
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:18:15 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019121816.9202-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261018071636.79198-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
Hi Damien,
Thanks for looking. I don't think RCU is needed here, because the reader
can only be the owner of the io_context:
- The only path that drops the task's reference is exit_io_context(),
which the task runs on itself in do_exit() (and on the copy_process()
error path, where the task never ran). It clears task->io_context
under task_lock() and only then puts the ioc.
- So when __get_task_ioprio() runs lockless, p == current, and current
cannot be inside exit_io_context() at the same time. Once the pointer
is non-NULL it stays valid for as long as current is executing; the
ioc cannot be freed under it.
- For p != current the function already requires p->alloc_lock
(lockdep_assert_held()), and that is what serializes against
exit_io_context().
The only thing another task can change under the lockless reader is the
NULL -> ioc transition and ->ioprio, both done by set_task_ioprio() under
task_lock(), and that is exactly what the KCSAN report shows
("value changed: 0x0 -> 0xffff..."). The patch only needs to make that
publication and the ->ioprio accesses well defined, not to extend the
lifetime of the ioc.
I can add a sentence to the commit message and a short comment in
__get_task_ioprio() stating this lifetime rule in a v2 if you think it
helps.
Thanks,
Nguyen Ngoc Thang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 7:16 Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-10-19 11:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-19 12:18 ` Nguyen Ngoc Thang [this message]
2026-10-19 12:28 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-19 12:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-10-19 15:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-20 12:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Nguyen Ngoc Thang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261019121816.9202-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--to=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®