mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:28:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atc6Vczti_EjFrQq@sirena.co.uk>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 11:11:20PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 07:17:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This issue is still present today.
> 
> > I removed these wrong kunit checks Friday so it should be good now, but

In fact, I updated mic/next Wednesday with a new patch series addressing
these issues.  I only added two (unrelated) commits on top of that
Friday.

> > I notice that linux-next still has the next-20261001/landlock merge
> > commit instead of the latest changes from mic/next (which should not
> > conflict).  Could you please confirm that a normal merge works?
> 
> It was broken with whatever I fetched yesterday hence me reporting it
> still broken and merging the old version, I've just started the merge
> for today so I'll find out this afternoon if the fix worked.

The new commits from Wednesday don't add the bogus kunit lines (i.e.
there is no kunit_suppressed_warning_count() calls anymore), so it's not
possible to get the same error.

Merging mic/next into the current linux-next works for me, and
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests works too.  Please let me
know if anything is wrong.

Regards,
 Mickaël

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10  0:31 Mark Brown
2026-10-19 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-19 21:11   ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20  9:54     ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 12:28       ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-10-20 13:02         ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 13:16           ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 13:33             ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 13:47               ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 13:46             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®