From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:28:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atc6Vczti_EjFrQq@sirena.co.uk>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 11:11:20PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 07:17:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This issue is still present today.
>
> > I removed these wrong kunit checks Friday so it should be good now, but
In fact, I updated mic/next Wednesday with a new patch series addressing
these issues. I only added two (unrelated) commits on top of that
Friday.
> > I notice that linux-next still has the next-20261001/landlock merge
> > commit instead of the latest changes from mic/next (which should not
> > conflict). Could you please confirm that a normal merge works?
>
> It was broken with whatever I fetched yesterday hence me reporting it
> still broken and merging the old version, I've just started the merge
> for today so I'll find out this afternoon if the fix worked.
The new commits from Wednesday don't add the bogus kunit lines (i.e.
there is no kunit_suppressed_warning_count() calls anymore), so it's not
possible to get the same error.
Merging mic/next into the current linux-next works for me, and
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests works too. Please let me
know if anything is wrong.
Regards,
Mickaël
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 0:31 Mark Brown
2026-10-19 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-19 21:11 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 12:28 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-10-20 13:02 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 13:16 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 13:33 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-20 13:47 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-20 13:46 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020.ij4euziuYovo@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®