From: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:21:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020082110.3511797-3-stanleyjhu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020082110.3511797-1-stanleyjhu@google.com>
ufshcd_poll() and ufshcd_abort() each have their own copy of the code
that clears bits in hba->outstanding_reqs under hba->outstanding_lock.
Move that code into ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() and its locked
variant __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(), and use them in both
functions. No functional change.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3779e125-9acc-42c8-9489-51b9e3c6716d@acm.org
Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
---
v3: Add __must_hold() and use guard(spinlock_irqsave) (Bart Van Assche).
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 12aafcf1f9b3..1b28dbba03a9 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -6052,6 +6052,29 @@ static void ufshcd_clear_polled(struct ufs_hba *hba,
}
}
+static unsigned long __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ unsigned long mask,
+ bool from_irq)
+ __must_hold(&hba->outstanding_lock)
+{
+ unsigned long completed_reqs = mask & hba->outstanding_reqs;
+
+ if (from_irq) {
+ /* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
+ ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
+ }
+ hba->outstanding_reqs &= ~completed_reqs;
+
+ return completed_reqs;
+}
+
+static unsigned long ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ unsigned long mask)
+{
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&hba->outstanding_lock);
+ return __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, mask, false);
+}
+
/*
* Return: > 0 if one or more commands have been completed or 0 if no
* requests have been completed.
@@ -6071,12 +6094,9 @@ static int ufshcd_poll(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int queue_num)
spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
- completed_reqs = ~tr_doorbell & hba->outstanding_reqs;
- if (queue_num == UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT) {
- /* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
- ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
- }
- hba->outstanding_reqs &= ~completed_reqs;
+ completed_reqs =
+ __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, ~tr_doorbell,
+ queue_num == UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
if (completed_reqs)
@@ -8111,7 +8131,6 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = scsi_cmd_priv(cmd);
unsigned long flags;
int err = FAILED;
- bool outstanding;
u32 reg;
ufshcd_hold(hba);
@@ -8206,11 +8225,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
* Clear the corresponding bit from outstanding_reqs since the command
* has been aborted successfully.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
- outstanding = __test_and_clear_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
-
- if (outstanding)
+ if (ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, BIT(tag)))
ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, cmd);
err = SUCCESS;
--
2.56.0.212.g129ede20d9-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 8:21 [PATCH v3 0/7] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completions Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` Stanley Jhu [this message]
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in ufshcd_eh_timed_out() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double release " Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double release in ufshcd_abort() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] scsi: ufs: core: Do not release a reserved request " Stanley Jhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020082110.3511797-3-stanleyjhu@google.com \
--to=stanleyjhu@google.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®