Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] firmware: arm_firme: introduce FIRME support for host attestation

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 06:05:35PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > 
> > > If we implments this with library, are you thinking that file should
> > > be located at driver/firmware/arm_firme or other place? though we make it
> > > with library, I still think it should be located at
> > > driver/firmware/arm_firme or some place in arch/arm64, but as
> > > perspective abstraction to mange firme helpers in one place,
> > > I think this design seems good.
> > 
> > Will has indicated a preference for driver/firwmare
> 
> Okay. with this let me make a driver/firmware/arm_firme as library not
> a module format and make this library APIs (base, attestation) to be used
> attestation and other. This means device / driver registeration with
> smccc and done in driver/attestation/provider but use the APIs from
> /driver/firmware/arm_firme.

You should try to structure it with a firme headerfile, and some
inline helpers to invoke the smcs and then a very small set of out of
line functions that *are used by multiple firme drivers*.

Don't put attestation in driver/firmware/arm_firme..

You can look at what I did for DRTM for some inspiration

https://lore.kernel.org/all/11-v2-989a18390eb1+486-arm64_drtm_jgg@nvidia.com/

After some feedback from Jonathon I think it turned out fairly well.

Jason