From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=178.238.236.174 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792527822; b=ZlIBXUsxE4ubjEuvG/Xr71r8P+X+M9V3KbHbVnLOHXEhxtk44Jv2Hs4F+bZL4vnyWqa+ 9z9XUysp30qycXalmmy3W7t65QiPZ/P6wdpsrTFsTRKtKvohQjJc7wptBKWJ+g4dAo25C b8kWc1fynK6Y4OthlbJ1eZJS+watR5ebcgrJvw+w3Udoa4wWFDkdIQIc6aWsx87goBSbb aCeuqeIa87F68ZZk6r+BR1mSB2XmtddhjP+0Mfs54bqfzT5ZLMHwxUaNovxW4iRjLHL3g xx66JQJQK3J/0sWdMHBP69DC1dozSUNgXAmekUM8RLgJg8Iire97PR9mtB0kPGT7NRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792527822; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=dksK0LI9fiDIV7Sk6UMzvHNbgK5hpd3kcFd8ssFu2So=; b=lNqRKanj3XZAhKfOHeF2AaY2Rkl0IOju8+eXJNbthlCemTOHvNFFqtVRfy6orA8K5syn /W9kBPxLqUY2jp2jST26myiwsVyLUsORksoEbZlgMWXlaG/ny/YzfhQNl1EDqTwS3W8Np lQ6HN0oOOJDSUbZUwwB+oCYiYDYGr/Hn7fa5+EDZU4ddzt796nnme4+1731Q5uEGWeG5h A1VAo3xVEk+qPcP5B/di51XUMQfCTX9C4jV6D/BFJ7rCb9u99U7zqoWhyoas9a0IGfbIO cd8SYRgNeGw3T2nDnb7Vu+mI+tObXHjW4EL89wNwOY10FTBMrzODWBnAB8oDBQsQpRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20220719 header.b=+XLj+flM; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=178.238.236.174 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [178.238.236.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22253606A31C; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 20:23:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 22253606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20220719 header.b=+XLj+flM DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=dksK0LI9fiDIV7Sk6UMzvHNbgK5hpd3kcFd8ssFu2So=; t=1792527821; x=1793737421; b=+XLj+flMO/avX97FfAAGs7F8H+Gxuz0imXvF/WcpN17og9Bx1vVsSo0pp6AZTEj+CyFUVO5rua2 JP8VUZPlF1fJONnV/ql0u8FkTz6BvSF9Vy5zbrAk/87DuO2SxMZB2J07lsCSdMoq23qHJtGcQnIpW zECbTHgoK1SM/djrCcd1QQyhgJXnQRtHqmFuvmdRW92vPRjt9WsOSiJ4++/1NA9C6GheIGb9jcn/B LYywhCFWneLHYsLaik2dohpf42CFaxPceAHSzw9nhtUtvq+xtKTBenG4WydXDEACX3SZBY+KdcD/j rhzIpfBtEtjvgs760w0NZu2NN6CB3Pd4L6RA==; Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 22:23:35 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Muhammad Mahdi Amirpour , Aaro Koskinen Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: ohci-omap: implement overcurrent handling for GPIO-based power control Message-ID: <20261020222335.7133c8a2@kemnade.info> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:45:15 +0330 Muhammad Mahdi Amirpour wrote: > I do not have the hardware to test this patch, so I cannot verify it > at runtime. Given that this is a legacy driver, I am happy to drop > this patch and work on something else if you think that would be > better. Otherwise, I can send a v5 addressing the Sashiko bot findings > (the IRQ handler ordering and the probe falling-edge race). > > Please let me know how you would like to proceed. So this patch practically only used on omap1, it does not improve maintainability (e.g. by removing the last user of some API) or apparently not a critical bug. So it should be tested. It should probably not be first priority to implement something you cannot test. @Aaro do you think that improves something valuable? Regards, Andreas