From: Jiaming Zhang <r772577952@gmail.com>
To: jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: libaokun@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, r772577952@gmail.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: clear in-inode xattr space before adding the first xattr
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:56:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021085635.3633692-1-r772577952@gmail.com> (raw)
An inode can hold extended attributes in the space that follows its extra
fields, whose size is given by i_extra_isize. When ext4 loads an inode,
ext4_iget_extra_inode() validates that space only if it starts with the
xattr magic, and only then sets EXT4_STATE_XATTR. Without the magic, the
space is treated as empty and is not checked.
ext4_xattr_ibody_set() passes the space to ext4_xattr_set_entry() whether
or not EXT4_STATE_XATTR is set. ext4_xattr_set_entry() walks the entries
there to find min_offs, the lowest value offset. That offset decides
whether the new value fits and where the value is copied:
free = min_offs - ((void *)last - s->base) - sizeof(__u32);
...
void *val = s->base + min_offs - new_size;
A crafted image can leave non-zero bytes in that space without the magic
where ext4 looks for it, for example by shrinking i_extra_isize. Those
bytes are parsed as entries, and an entry that claims an in-inode value at
offset 0 sets min_offs to 0. Because free is a size_t, the subtraction
then wraps around to a huge value, and the free space check passes although
the value does not fit. The value is copied new_size bytes before the
start of the space, over the inode's own fields and, for a large value, the
memory in front of the inode.
On a kernel without KASAN, the copy corrupts memory: it overwrites the
inode's own fields and, for a large value, also the memory in front of the
inode. The bytes and their length are decided by the setxattr() caller.
Nothing is freed and reused here, so the use-after-free in the report only
reflects where the write happened to land.
Triggering this issue requires mounting a crafted image, which needs
CAP_SYS_ADMIN or automounting of removable media; after that, any
setxattr() on the file reaches this path. The issue was found by fuzzing
and has not been seen in production; a reproducer is available in the
linked report.
When EXT4_STATE_XATTR is not set, zero the first 32 bits of the space in
ext4_xattr_ibody_set() before calling ext4_xattr_set_entry(). These are
the bits IS_LAST_ENTRY() reads, so the space is treated as empty and the
walk stops before reading any stale entry.
Fixes: ac27a0ec112a ("[PATCH] ext4: initial copy of files from ext3")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANypQFZzxTAH=4QRRDoqH6VAw1daAq88NDWiQKoM7QTOnP40sg@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-opus-5-5
Signed-off-by: Jiaming Zhang <r772577952@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Zero only the first 32 bits space instead of the whole space.
- Add a comment above the check.
- v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260916084723.877552-1-r772577952@gmail.com/
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index 5c310747b965..8e1fd26329d3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,14 @@ int ext4_xattr_ibody_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (IS_ERR(ea_inode))
return PTR_ERR(ea_inode);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure xattr space is properly initialized so that
+ * IS_LAST_ENTRY() returns true for its first entry
+ */
+ if (!ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR))
+ *(__u32 *)s->first = 0;
+
error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode, ea_inode,
false /* is_block */);
if (error) {
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261021085635.3633692-1-r772577952@gmail.com \
--to=r772577952@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®