From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792614187; b=XTcSMrpMaa96WqBXlVx95x/+Qmvf6iMsEdIkClJTOFTIvV0JrG7RqS9X4j7QdOW0HaEm fvO2kBVoGFyH3gHSfZ5dkyBjhSW5WMm+4ISpCzGBhxTlMHw1twddi2gJ02SWiVc8VrHgh 3qLQKOBcszjfmkAPCjfEVlnmTkbUj/zG6qjsU1M1MF1KXjyKGaxBff3vYGNnByLNMhHPF GbHz1qfQCph495Im1mvITQQN/ZNlGIrhNK+yOrTmV01DxRF8FrK4f6Ot/gemkyeUYeFPj Au9BCPw2iCGWw/P+D2C17RS7cwJYdwVJuUx5gc+8lCs8+sJzp8PP7Qb3WhVqHRQ47Tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792614187; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=svbLHawCS4fbgc8FgUAE9dACgxqB99TX/pf/aIWHxmw=; b=PBJPg4b0JVgLwyKdh28vgga5MJOeA7Tc3tYumhhrH/iE+RFYyPnjn4vjdL1DnTX5JtKv MfGu1o0TzgMYVVADOGijIcusH/nxgJF8WhKxCKyCzX51alqpJsTbeKanSMnaCIpFOrbY4 jPNk8DtA+xkuvrUZD2yjpzMmYVcGeMEUDtXCy8QwuOLoJ82Eczo+W8rFaZJZ383xWfbtI Y+/jXYs6S8MuRo1qWBSjHP0Ux29xmrCAbv66IRWPu32Hl+7K7As3toIEBDnr0iO52W9wa LwY82LqhIe6FNs40q3ruVp/qkPKquctBjVt2g9naj0LtyZesSXrAMHarL3j+WjoW4/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="Xt6/atqy"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5BC606A31B; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Xt6/atqy Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7038B1F000C1; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:23:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792614186; bh=svbLHawCS4fbgc8FgUAE9dACgxqB99TX/pf/aIWHxmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Xt6/atqypGAD9faryuoH3pgi4bQyVVE+O07lp7aASyyT+FjnI8XTnoivNgxAwDhec Xfo3gi2XcyeLmjrLYvmosrThi+PoBZYzkwjHAo0eRu+Vlc9DI+00/VrcYgSCZrPdHb JOGx4pQdXWFUq8yH3QQEzSRu6hrI+GjfUedgt53bUyqFAQV7XQZTF0LwdsCb1sHWuM moz22KoG1vi7VY4g0aCEA7fdlfYla+rzgWwRFk5/9HUG5gPMTqGokYS6omzjbIT0O/ ZNvHAn9mKMOD9soFx/Go9d98JombmkpZrOCi4rh36dgn9CTej7Xb6ItJQmx50xcWcQ suBfY00yvRSqA== Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:23:04 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Mina Almasry Cc: Pavel Begunkov , David Wei , Stanislav Fomichev , Taehee Yoo , Paolo Abeni , Kaiyuan Zhang , Bobby Eshleman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Ilias Apalodimas , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , Dragos Tatulea , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Daniel Borkmann , Tariq Toukan , Kaifeng Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 3/4] netdevsim: support devmem RX and TX bindings Message-ID: <20261021132304.23e0a4e7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20261015163915.1166043-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20261015163915.1166043-4-almasrymina@google.com> <20261020121858.3b9107c5@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:17:34 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > But on the other hand the test coverage is nice, and maybe one day if > we add enough devmem support in netdevsim we'll be able to fuzz the > data path or something. Is there a way to get the best of both worlds? > Like put a comment on top of netdevsim that this is test simulator > device and any missing functionality and/or bugs in it should be > medium criticality max or something? Or is it too much trouble and I > should drop the netdevsim support and tests? I already strip Fixes tags and apply the patches to net-next. But it's still a burden. If you're signing up to fix the issues / review the slop we can try.