From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: Extend for_each_sched_entity() with a back-link
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:52:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021155211.GV88198@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCgAjDXgRVBPUSKi4gq1pPN6b7dcP2myMhoOQ9Tyj7_nw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 06:54:39PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sept 2026 at 10:55, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Leave a trail of bread crumbs, such that we can find our way back down the
> > hierarchy. No actual users yet, but split out because its a bit tricky.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -318,8 +318,13 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_clas
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> >
> > /* Walk up scheduling entities hierarchy */
> > -#define for_each_sched_entity(se, cfs_rq) \
> > - for (; (se) && ((cfs_rq) = cfs_rq_of(se)); (se) = (se)->parent)
> > +#define for_each_sched_entity(se, cfs_rq) \
> > + for (struct sched_entity *_BL = NULL; \
> > + (se) && ((cfs_rq) = cfs_rq_of(se), (cfs_rq)->backlink = _BL, true);\
> > + (se) = (se)->parent, _BL = (se))
> > +
> > +#define for_each_sched_entity_bl(se, cfs_rq) \
> > + for (; ((se) = (cfs_rq)->backlink); (cfs_rq) = group_cfs_rq(se))
> >
> > static inline bool list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > {
> > @@ -456,6 +461,9 @@ static int se_is_idle(struct sched_entit
> > #define for_each_sched_entity(se, cfs_rq) \
> > for (; (se) && ((cfs_rq) = cfs_rq_of(se)); (se) = NULL)
> >
> > +#define for_each_sched_entity_bl(se, cfs_rq) \
> > + for (; ((se) = NULL);)
> > +
> > static inline bool list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > {
> > return true;
> > @@ -15233,7 +15241,7 @@ static inline void task_tick_core(struct
> > /*
> > * se_fi_update - Update the cfs_rq->zero_vruntime_fi in a CFS hierarchy if needed.
> > */
> > -static void se_fi_update(const struct sched_entity *se, unsigned int fi_seq,
> > +static void se_fi_update(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned int fi_seq,
>
> Not sure this should be part of this patch
My build scripts argued it should be. It breaks with the fancy new
for_each_sched_entity().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 8:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] sched/fair: Rework task_h_load() Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched: Rename/clarify sched_class::task_tick(.queued) argument Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-13 16:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-10-13 17:14 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-15 20:01 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-16 5:32 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: Fold cfs_rq_of(se) into for_each_sched_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-13 16:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: Extend for_each_sched_entity() with a back-link Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-13 16:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-10-21 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-10-21 16:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/fair: Rework/fix task_h_load() Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-29 17:46 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-30 1:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-30 5:45 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-30 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-30 10:20 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-30 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-30 11:44 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-01 21:16 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-13 16:56 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261021155211.GV88198@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®