mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Binbin Deng <18983559317@163.com>
Cc: jmaloy@redhat.com, tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tipc: fix use-after-free of broadcast reception link at node release
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:02:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021160231.GC708417@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019104352.488347-1-18983559317@163.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 06:43:52PM +0800, Binbin Deng wrote:
> When the last reference to a tipc_node is dropped, the node itself is
> deferred to the RCU callback tipc_node_free(), but the nested broadcast
> reception link, n->bc_entry.link, is kfree()d synchronously in
> tipc_node_kref_release(), before call_rcu(), and the pointer is never
> cleared.  Readers that obtained the node from node_list and then
> dereference bc_entry.link deep into the link (tipc_link_name() in
> tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats(), bcl->name/stats in
> tipc_nl_add_bc_link() on the link dump path) therefore touch freed
> memory although the enclosing node stays alive for a full grace period.
> The sibling per-bearer links get "kfree + NULL" under the node write
> lock in tipc_node_clear_links(); the broadcast entry was missed.
> 
> The race is reachable through the node cleanup timer: once a peer has
> been unreachable for NODE_CLEANUP_AFTER (300 s), tipc_node_timeout() ->
> tipc_node_cleanup() unlinks the node under the write lock, and the
> final tipc_node_put() at the caller runs outside node_list_lock, so the
> kfree executes in timer softirq context, concurrently with genl dump/
> reset walkers that hold only rcu_read_lock().  (A netlink "peer remove"
> cannot race those walkers itself: tipc_genl_family has no parallel_ops,
> so all doit/dumpit calls serialize on the global genl lock.)
> 
> Reproduced in a QEMU/KVM guest running v7.3.0 with KASAN and
> PREEMPT(full): 10 TIPC peer namespaces on veth bearers, bearer removal
> staggered so the 300 s node cleanup timers expire while other tasks
> loop link dumps with the broadcast filter and reset-link-stats lookups.
> KASAN hit within two cleanup cycles:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in strlen+0x85/0xa0
>   Read of size 1 at addr ffff88800b54a004 by task poc_eth/371
>    strlen+0x85/0xa0
>    tipc_nl_add_bc_link+0x2f9/0xd40
>    __tipc_nl_add_node_links+0x10c/0x140
>    tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x8d5/0xd50
>   Freed by task 0:
>    kfree+0x121/0x380
>    tipc_node_timeout+0xa33/0xcf0
>    run_timer_softirq+0x144/0x250
>    sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt

For reference, it is preferred to provide stack traces decoded using
scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh as the information provided easies the
work of review.

> 
> with the freed object being the kmalloc-1k tipc_link allocated by
> tipc_link_bc_create() during peer discovery.  The same defect fires in
> strcmp() called from tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats().
> 
> Move the kfree of n->bc_entry.link into the tipc_node_free() RCU
> callback so the broadcast link lives exactly as long as the enclosing
> node.  All readers are covered: the netlink walkers are inside
> rcu_read_lock(), and the packet reception path reaches the node via
> tipc_node_find(), whose kref defers kref_release itself.
> 
> Found during a static-analysis-assisted audit: candidate sites were
> surfaced by a Coccinelle rule, and the reader/writer paths were
> confirmed by LLM-assisted (GLM-5.3) code inspection.
> 
> Fixes: d25a01257e42 ("tipc: fix crash during node removal")
> Assisted-by: GLM-5.3 coccinelle
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Deng <18983559317@163.com>

Thanks for the analysis and patch.
This looks correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19 10:43 Binbin Deng
2026-10-21 16:02 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261021160231.GC708417@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=18983559317@163.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®