From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <sergeh@kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] capabilities: close the ways around the CAP_SETFCAP rule for uid 0
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:36:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261022-b4-setfcap-userns-v4-0-88aa0ffaa08f@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261006-b4-setfcap-userns-v1-0-f47e7ed66072@toxicpanda.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261014-b4-setfcap-userns-v2-0-fac4d19281d7@toxicpanda.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261021-b4-setfcap-userns-v3-0-97c7ed4e43e1@toxicpanda.com/
v3->v4:
- 4/5: a v2 security.capability xattr skipped the new checks, it was
written as is whenever the writer had CAP_SETFCAP over the
filesystem's namespace. It now only does that when the filesystem's
root user is within reach, and goes through the v3 conversion and its
checks otherwise (Sashiko).
v2->v3:
- The setns() check in 2/5 and the ptrace check in 5/5 only apply to
namespaces that map the root user of an ancestor within the creator's
CAP_SETFCAP, or that have no uid_map yet. Root users stored through
an idmapped mount are left to whoever sets up the mount, so a root
task without CAP_SETFCAP can join an ordinary "0 100000" container
again (Serge, Christian).
- 2/5 adds cred_may_setfcap_userns() for those two checks and
cred_setfcap_reaches() for the uid_map check; nothing outside
create_user_ns() calls cap_setfcap_level() directly (Serge).
- Fixed the cap_setfcap_level() kernel-doc, @ns doesn't have to be the
cred's namespace or below; cap_capable() is compared with != 0
(Serge).
- Picked up Bradley's Reviewed-by on 1/5 and 3/5, not on 2/5, which
changed.
- Rebased onto current vfs.all.
v1->v2:
- The state lives on the user namespace now: ns->setfcap_level replaces
ns->parent_could_setfcap, and cred->setfcap_level is gone (Serge,
Christian).
- New 2/5: setns() refuses a task whose CAP_SETFCAP doesn't reach as far
up as the namespace's setfcap_level. It applies to every user
namespace, not only to those that map the parent's uid 0, because of
idmapped mounts (Serge, Christian).
- 5/5 asks a tracer for what setns() asks for, also when the namespace
doesn't map an ancestor's root user, again because of idmapped mounts.
- Dropped "userns: don't let setns() lend the right to map uid 0", the
setns() check covers it. Its nested case moved into 3/5, which checks
the opener and the writer.
- set_cred_user_ns() isn't touched anymore, so the put-before-use in
userns_install() is gone (Sashiko).
- Rebased onto current vfs.all.
What it does now:
Every user namespace gets a setfcap_level when it's created, which is
how far up the creator's CAP_SETFCAP counted. If its tasks can write
file capabilities for the root user of an ancestor, because the
namespace maps that root user or can still map it, setns() only lets in
tasks whose own CAP_SETFCAP reaches that far, and PTRACE_ATTACH asks the
tracer for the same. The checks on the way to file capabilities then go
by the namespace instead of the cred: a uid_map write that maps the
parent's uid 0 (opener and writer), and setting security.capability.
The visible difference from v1 is the setns() restriction. A task
without CAP_SETFCAP can't join, or attach to tasks in, a namespace that
maps the root user of an ancestor, such as host uid 0, and was created
by a task that had it. A task that joins takes on the namespace's
reach. Containers that don't map host uid 0, unprivileged users and
anything with CAP_SETFCAP aren't affected.
Testing: the v1 flows plus the setns() and ptrace cases, 41 in all, on
vfs.all with and without the series. For v4 also the v2 xattr route: a
task that unshared without CAP_SETFCAP mounts a tmpfs, writes a v2 xattr
on it, and an overlay mounted from the initial namespace makes a uid
1000 user run the file with CAP_SYS_ADMIN. That works without the
series and with v3, and gets -EPERM with v4. Every flow gives what's
expected, and the only ones that changed from v2 are the five idmapped
mount and "0 100000" container cases, which are allowed again. The
pidfd, namespaces, mount_setattr and ptrace selftests give identical
results with and without. The TLA+ model, which has no idmapped mounts,
finds no violation with the narrower checks, and still finds the setns()
bypass when the check is taken out.
--- Original email (v1) ---
Hello,
Commit db2e718a4798 ("capabilities: require CAP_SETFCAP to map uid 0")
stops a root task that has given up CAP_SETFCAP from creating a user
namespace that maps uid 0 and then writing file capabilities in it that
the initial namespace honours. The check only looks at the task that
creates the namespace, so if somebody who did have CAP_SETFCAP created
one, there are still several ways around it:
- setns() into their namespace and write uid_map from inside (patch 2)
- write "0 0 1" through a uid_map fd that they opened (patch 3)
- setns() into a namespace of theirs that already maps uid 0 and set
security.capability there, no map write needed (patch 4)
- ptrace one of their tasks and have it do any of the above (patch 5)
On an unmodified kernel we took a uid 0 task with CAP_SETFCAP dropped
from its permitted, effective and bounding sets and, through each of
these, ended up with a file that a uid 1000 user execs with
CAP_SYS_ADMIN in its effective set.
Patch 1 adds cred->setfcap_level, which records how far up the
namespace tree a task's CAP_SETFCAP reached when it entered its
namespace, and patches 2-5 check it. Patch 4 is the check that closes
the class, the map patches make the uid 0 map rule mean what
db2e718a4798 meant it to, and patch 5 keeps ptrace from borrowing what
the target is entitled to.
This does change behaviour. Everything new is -EPERM:
- a task that entered a namespace without CAP_SETFCAP outside can't map
uid 0 of the outside or write fscaps for that root user anymore
- a uid_map fd opened by a task with CAP_SETFCAP can't be used by a
task without it to map uid 0
- if a privileged task maps "0 0 1" from the parent for a namespace
created by a task without CAP_SETFCAP, that namespace can no longer
write fscaps honoured outside
- PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_TRACEME fail when the tracer gave up
CAP_SETFCAP and CAP_SYS_PTRACE, the target didn't, and they share a
root user
Rootless containers, privileged runtimes writing the map from the
parent, nested unprivileged namespaces and containers that don't map
host uid 0 aren't affected. The ptrace check is one compare for
targets in the initial namespace and in namespaces entered without
the capability.
Testing: a set of flows run on the base and patched kernels, every
bypass route above gets -EPERM with the series and the 16 legitimate
flows behave the same. The capabilities, namespaces, ptrace, pidfd and
proc selftests give the same results before and after. Thanks,
Josef
---
Changes in v4:
- Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20261021-b4-setfcap-userns-v3-0-97c7ed4e43e1@toxicpanda.com
Changes in v3:
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20261014-b4-setfcap-userns-v2-0-fac4d19281d7@toxicpanda.com
Changes in v2:
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20261006-b4-setfcap-userns-v1-0-f47e7ed66072@toxicpanda.com
---
Josef Bacik (5):
userns: record how far up CAP_SETFCAP reaches
userns: don't let setns() lend CAP_SETFCAP
userns: check the opener and the writer before mapping uid 0
capabilities: limit fscaps to where CAP_SETFCAP reaches
capabilities: don't let ptrace borrow CAP_SETFCAP
include/linux/capability.h | 7 ++
include/linux/user_namespace.h | 7 +-
kernel/user_namespace.c | 37 +++++++--
security/commoncap.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 2c3ba1f1cb416b81d617b92a24a4bcaa48d574e3
change-id: 20261006-b4-setfcap-userns-d63185a31ce3
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 18:36 Josef Bacik [this message]
2026-10-22 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] userns: record how far up CAP_SETFCAP reaches Josef Bacik
2026-10-22 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] userns: don't let setns() lend CAP_SETFCAP Josef Bacik
2026-10-22 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] userns: check the opener and the writer before mapping uid 0 Josef Bacik
2026-10-22 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] capabilities: limit fscaps to where CAP_SETFCAP reaches Josef Bacik
2026-10-22 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] capabilities: don't let ptrace borrow CAP_SETFCAP Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261022-b4-setfcap-userns-v4-0-88aa0ffaa08f@toxicpanda.com \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®