From: <amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>
To: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<amirmohammadeftekhar@gmail.com>,
Amirmohammad Eftekhar <amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Reject nested VM-entry in wait-for-SIPI with a pending event injection
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 23:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261022215146.233479-3-amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atqDVkHjdJ2iF9Uv@google.com>
From: Amirmohammad Eftekhar <amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>
The SDM allows no interruptions in the wait-for-SIPI activity state, but
nested_check_guest_non_reg_state() accepts a vmcs12 with WAIT_SIPI and a valid
VM-entry interruption-information field. Hardware does not catch it: KVM
emulates wait-for-SIPI in software only after a successful entry (the mp_state
= INIT_RECEIVED arm) while the injection is copied into vmcs02, so the physical
VMLAUNCH sees {active, valid injection} -- a legal pair -- and succeeds. From
L1's point of view a VMLAUNCH that bare metal rejects with a VM-entry failure
instead succeeds, with L2 parked in wait-for-SIPI holding a stale
VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO. Reject the combination.
Signed-off-by: Amirmohammad Eftekhar <amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 6e2ec1912f12..d98d33234e9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -3316,6 +3316,10 @@ static int nested_check_guest_non_reg_state(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
(GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI | GUEST_INTR_STATE_MOV_SS))))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (vmcs12->guest_activity_state == GUEST_ACTIVITY_WAIT_SIPI &&
+ CC(vmcs12->vm_entry_intr_info_field & INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 21:12 [PATCH] " Amirmohammad Eftekhar
2026-10-22 21:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-22 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] KVM: nVMX: Add the activity-state cross-checks VM-entry requires amirmohammad.eftekhar
2026-10-22 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: nVMX: Reject nested VM-entry in a non-active state blocked by STI/MOV-SS amirmohammad.eftekhar
2026-10-22 21:51 ` amirmohammad.eftekhar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261022215146.233479-3-amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de \
--to=amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de \
--cc=amirmohammadeftekhar@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®