From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] srcutree: Disable preemption across synchronize_srcu_atomic()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:19:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023001955.GA4134349@joelbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007205924.1983367-7-paulmck@kernel.org>
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 01:59:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Because synchronize_srcu_atomic() cannot sleep, if a pair of them run
> concurrently pinned to the same CPU, it is possible that one will spin
> uselessly waiting for the other while at the same time preventing that
> other from running. This commit therefore disables preemption to prevent
> this failure mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 7ff45e992c011..672fb41345c91 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -2123,11 +2123,14 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>
> // Perhaps others will do our work for us.
> srcu_state = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
> + preempt_disable();
Should this be upgraded to local_irq_disable()?
> while (atomic_read(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag) ||
> atomic_xchg(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 1)) {
> + preempt_enable();
> if (poll_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp, srcu_state))
> return;
Otherwise, it is possible that an interrupt handler comes in here while the
srcu_atomic_gp_flag is already acquired and then spins forever?
If we disabled IRQs as well, along with preempt, that might add other
problems, though, such as a reader calling smp_call_function waiting for the
IPI handler to run on this CPU which is spinning with interrupts disabled.
thanks,
Joel Fernandes
> cpu_relax();
> + preempt_disable();
> }
>
> // One last check for others doing our work for us under the lock.
> @@ -2135,6 +2138,7 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> if (poll_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp, srcu_state)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sup);
> atomic_set(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 0);
> + preempt_enable();
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2152,6 +2156,7 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> }
> ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag);
> atomic_set_release(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 0);
> + preempt_enable();
> non_block_end();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu_atomic);
> --
> 2.40.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 20:59 [PATCH v2 0/21] Add atomic SRCU &c for v7.4 Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] srcutiny: Make a Tiny SRCU grace period imply an RCU grace period Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] srcutree: Suppress srcu_advance_state() mutex_lock in atomic Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] srcutree: Suppress to-big transition for atomic SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] srcutree: Add an atomic Tree SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-08 7:39 ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-08 15:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-12 12:49 ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-14 21:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-14 21:31 ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-14 22:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] srcutiny: Add an atomic Tiny SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] rcutorture: Add support for testing synchronize_srcu_atomic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] srcutree: Disable preemption across synchronize_srcu_atomic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-23 0:19 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2026-10-23 2:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] srcu: Use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD for srcu's irq_work Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] srcutree: Warn if Tiny SRCU readers are preempted Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] srcutree: Explicitly note DEFINE_SRCU() needs for srcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] rcutorture: Add atomic-SRCU support to torture.sh Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] srcutree: Add reader-free fastpath to synchronize_srcu_atomic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] srcutree: Skip callback scheduling for atomic SRCU grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] srcutree: Remove srcu_barrier() sleep for atomic SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] srcu: Restrict atomic-SRCU non_block annotation to task context Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] srcutree: Make init_srcu_struct_atomic() prevent transition to big Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] srcutree: Don't transition atomic SRCU to big in srcu_gp_end() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] srcutree: Skip torture to-big transition for atomic SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] srcutree: Add lockdep and early-boot checks to synchronize_srcu_atomic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] srcutiny: " Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] srcutree: Preserve IRQ state in synchronize_srcu_atomic() callchain Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261023001955.GA4134349@joelbox \
--to=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®