From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Ruben Hakobyan <hruben@meta.com>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
"Atish Patra" <atishp@meta.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: batch large descriptor chains for page reporting
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:04:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023042737-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023081923.164950-1-hruben@meta.com>
Great patch, thanks!
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 01:19:19AM -0700, Ruben Hakobyan wrote:
> The virtio_balloon driver reports a scatter-gather list of free pages
> to the VMM so it may discard unused pages.
>
> For an arm64 kernel with 64 KiB pages, the default reporting and
> allocation orders allow entries ranging from 2 MiB to 512 MiB. If the
> report contains a sufficient number of large entries, we will end up
> with a descriptor chain that represents over 4 GiB of memory. This
> violates virtio spec section 2.7.5.2, which requires that the total
> buffer length of a descriptor chain be at most 4 GiB [1]. A VMM that
> faithfully follows the spec may stop processing the descriptor chain
> when it exceeds 4 GiB, and discard less memory than it could. For
> example, this is the case for the virtio-queue in Rust-VMM [2].
>
> Batch the requests into descriptor chains of at most U32_MAX bytes
> (4 GiB - 1 byte). We use U32_MAX here so we can conveniently represent
> the batch length in a u32.
It's not just a question of convenient, is it?
Rust is buggy wrt to spec as it allows only U32_MAX.
So it is also to make it work.
So should we maybe fix Rust to be spec compliant and allow 2^32 too?
I think we should definitely recommend U32_MAX in the spec
because otherwise it can not fit in the used length.
>
> [1] https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.4/virtio-v1.4.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/rust-vmm/rust-vmm/blob/9f7250b1555ebe022ea4133fda676e6311040738/vm-virtio/virtio-queue/src/chain.rs#L183-L190
>
> Fixes: b0c504f15471 ("virtio-balloon: add support for providing free page reports to host")
> Signed-off-by: Ruben Hakobyan <hruben@meta.com>
> ---
> The wording in the spec is a bit ambiguous because it uses "chain
> length" for both descriptor counts and the total size of the memory
> ranges referenced by the descriptors. My read is that the byte limit
> applies to the sum of descriptor lengths, which is also what rust-vmm
> checks.
quote what you are referring to please, also in the commit log
not after ---.
I would also CC virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev - spec should recommend
U32_MAX.
>
> Another option I considered was to limit reporting capacity based
> on the largest possible block. E.g. for 64 KiB pages, the largest
> block is 512 MiB, so limit the reporting capacity to 7 to stay
> below 4GiB. Although simpler, I found that the time to reclaim
> was quite a bit longer.
So I was going to apply this actually:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b541ff170218bd5d45b551b5132e7cf2c490d761.1780906288.git.mst@redhat.com/
which makes the question completely moot.
Does this have any effect on performance?
Thanks!
>
> I tested this patch on Cloud Hypervisor (which uses Rust-VMM)
> and QEMU (which doesn't enforce this limit).
>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> index ab3e3d887e00..68ce627c8e04 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/balloon.h>
> +#include <linux/limits.h>
> #include <linux/oom.h>
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -207,21 +208,43 @@ static int virtballoon_free_page_report(struct page_reporting_dev_info *pr_dev_i
> struct virtqueue *vq = vb->reporting_vq;
> unsigned int unused, err;
>
> - /* We should always be able to add these buffers to an empty queue. */
> - err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(vq, sg, nents, vb, GFP_NOWAIT);
> + while (nents) {
> + bool unmark_end;
> + struct scatterlist *sg_batch_start = sg;
> + u32 batch_len = 0;
> + unsigned int batch_nents = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * In the extremely unlikely case that something has occurred and we
> - * are able to trigger an error we will simply display a warning
> - * and exit without actually processing the pages.
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
> - return err;
> + /*
> + * Virtio spec 2.7.5.2
Please add spec version and chapter title, and quote the
spec text in question verbatim.
> limits the total buffer length of a
> + * descriptor chain to 2^32 bytes (4 GiB), so split larger
> + * reports into batches no bigger than that size.
> + */
> + while (batch_nents < nents &&
> + sg->length <= U32_MAX - batch_len) {
here you actually limit to U32_MAX which is 2^32 - 1 as commit log says.
> + batch_len += sg->length;
> + batch_nents += 1;
> + sg = sg_next(sg);
> + }
> + unmark_end = !sg_is_last(&sg_batch_start[batch_nents - 1]);
>
> - virtqueue_kick(vq);
> + if (unmark_end)
> + sg_mark_end(&sg_batch_start[batch_nents - 1]);
>
> - /* When host has read buffer, this completes via balloon_ack */
> - wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &unused));
> + err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(vq, sg_batch_start, batch_nents, vb,
> + GFP_NOWAIT);
> +
> + if (unmark_end)
> + sg_unmark_end(&sg_batch_start[batch_nents - 1]);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
> + return err;
> +
> + virtqueue_kick(vq);
> +
> + /* When host has read buffer, this completes via balloon_ack */
> + wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &unused));
> + nents -= batch_nents;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 8:19 Ruben Hakobyan
2026-10-23 10:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261023042737-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atishp@meta.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hruben@meta.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®