mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex <xnderv@yandex.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xnderv@yandex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: idle the channel before destroying an engine object via abi16
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:23:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023152332.9420-1-xnderv@yandex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023144219.46478-1-xnderv@yandex.com>

On the Sashiko AI review of this patch:

> Can calling nouveau_channel_idle(obj->chan->chan) here race with jobs
> running on obj->chan->sched when VM_BIND is enabled?

Thanks, the race is real.

Legacy PUSHBUF submissions take cli->mutex (nouveau_abi16_get()), so they
are serialized with nouveau_abi16_ioctl_del(), which is why the Chromium
case was fixed by the plain nouveau_channel_idle().  With VM_BIND the
EXEC jobs are pushed from the scheduler workqueue without cli->mutex, so
emitting a fence from the ioctl could indeed race with
nouveau_exec_job_run(), and jobs still queued in the entity would not be
covered by the fence at all.

v2 (sent as a reply to this thread) waits for the channel's scheduler to
drain first -- the same job-list wait nouveau_sched_fini() already does,
factored out as nouveau_sched_wait_idle() -- and then idles the channel.
New EXEC submissions cannot sneak in meanwhile because the EXEC ioctl
also holds cli->mutex.

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23 14:42 Alex
2026-10-23 15:23 ` Alex [this message]
2026-10-23 15:23   ` [PATCH v2] " Alex

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023152332.9420-1-xnderv@yandex.com \
    --to=xnderv@yandex.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®