From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/vma: write lock source VMA before duplicating it in __split_vma()
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 12:26:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023192627.yj5ltdj4fjzydblp@offworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023-fix-vma-atomic-v1-2-8ff4fae1fc85@kernel.org>
On Fri, 23 Oct 2026, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
>
>__split_vma() duplicates the source VMA before taking its VMA write lock,
>and until the VMA is write-locked, a concurrent thread might set
>VMA_MAYBE_GUARD_BIT, resulting in the duplication missing the flag.
>
>If this happens, then fork may fail to duplicate guard markers and, if a
>file-backed mapping, THP collapse may also discard the markers.
>
>Resolve this by taking the VMA write lock before vm_area_dup() and, since
>all callers of vm_area_dup() now hold the VMA write lock, assert that this
>is the case there, and add a comment to explain why it's needed.
>
>Fixes: 2ab7f1bbafc9 ("mm/madvise: allow guard page install/remove under VMA lock")
>Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
>[ ljs - add VMA write assert in vm_area_dup(), commit message touchup ]
>Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
... with one nit below.
>---
> mm/vma.c | 2 +-
> mm/vma_init.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
>index 1be613044b4a..aa59005e2f42 100644
>--- a/mm/vma.c
>+++ b/mm/vma.c
>@@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ __split_vma(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return err;
> }
>
>+ vma_start_write(vma);
> new = vm_area_dup(vma);
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>@@ -568,7 +569,6 @@ __split_vma(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (new->vm_ops && new->vm_ops->open)
> new->vm_ops->open(new);
>
>- vma_start_write(vma);
> vma_start_write(new);
>
> init_vma_prep(&vp, vma);
>diff --git a/mm/vma_init.c b/mm/vma_init.c
>index baa7e82f47e3..d661f229a734 100644
>--- a/mm/vma_init.c
>+++ b/mm/vma_init.c
>@@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vm_area_dup(struct vm_area_struct *orig)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *new = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>+ /* Must hold a write lock to stabilise atomic VMA flags. */
should just say "stabilize atomic VMA flags".
>+ vma_assert_write_locked(orig);
>+
> if (!new)
> return NULL;
>
>
>--
>2.56.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 13:47 [PATCH 0/4] mm: avoid losing atomic VMA flags Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: do not unintentionally overwrite " Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/vma: write lock source VMA before duplicating it in __split_vma() Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-23 19:26 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2026-10-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/madvise: preserve VMA_SOFTDIRTY_BIT when changing anonymous names Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/vma: avoid losing atomic VMA flags when setting sticky VMA flags Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-23 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm: avoid losing atomic " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261023192627.yj5ltdj4fjzydblp@offworld \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®