mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next v2 07/10] cgroup/cpuset: Make sure compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:00:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023200036.60560-8-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023200036.60560-1-longman@redhat.com>

With visual inspection to make sure that
compute_partition_effective_cpumask() is only called for valid partition
root, it was found that the function can be called for an invalidated
partition near the end of cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(). When partcmd is
set, update_parent_effective_cpumask() is called to either invalidate a
valid partition or with partcmd_update to check if an invalid partition
can be switched back to valid. In both cases, cpuset_force_rebuild()
should be invoked. However, compute_partition_effective_cpumask()
should only be called when an invalid partition is switched back to
valid. When a partition is invalidated, compute_effective_cpumask()
should be called instead.

Also add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() to
ensure that a valid partition root is passed in.

Fixes: 72c6303acfa1 ("cgroup/cpuset: Take isolated CPUs out of workqueue unbound cpumask")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d995f1ec5259..2c3a148fa40b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -2116,6 +2116,8 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
 	struct cpuset *child;
 	bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_partition_valid(cs));
+
 	/*
 	 * Check child partition roots to see if they should be
 	 * invalidated when
@@ -4023,9 +4025,12 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 
 	if (partcmd >= 0) {
 		update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, partcmd, NULL, tmp);
-		if ((partcmd == partcmd_invalidate) || is_partition_valid(cs)) {
+		if (is_partition_valid(cs)) {
 			compute_partition_effective_cpumask(cs, &new_cpus);
 			cpuset_force_rebuild();
+		} else if (partcmd == partcmd_invalidate) {
+			compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
+			cpuset_force_rebuild();
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.56.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23 20:00 [PATCH-next v2 00/10] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes & cleanup Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 01/10] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 02/10] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 03/10] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 04/10] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 05/10] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 06/10] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 08/10] cgroup/cpuset: Update isolated_cpus if necessary in compute_partition_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 09/10] cgroup/cpuset: Relocate compute_*effective_cpumask() and compute_effective_nodemask() Waiman Long
2026-10-23 20:00 ` [PATCH-next v2 10/10] cgroup/cpuset: Integrate compute_partition_effective_cpumask() into compute_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023200036.60560-8-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®