To explain this further:

- I might be wrong, but this patch looks completely bogus to me.
  Why would this be bi-directional?
  If this is accessed bi-directionally, there must be a bug somewhere else.
- Please provide a HUMAN WRITTEN patch description.
  This is really important.

I am all for using AI for development.
Especially for such old and legacy code.
HOWEVER, there must be a human present and understanding what is being done.

Please slow down your submissions.
Think about your patches before submission.
TEST your code before submission and send evidence of your tests.
Untested code is to be rejected.

-- 
Michael Büsch
https://bues.ch/


On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 22:14:24 +0200
Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> wrote:

> Quite honestly, to me this looks like a lot of AI slop is sent to b43 these days.
> Can you please slow down your submissions so that actual people get a chance to review the stuff?
> Thanks!
>