From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ocfs2: fix stale xattr entry pointers and empty header reads
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:37:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024103709.7ada16bbca6403787892cb5c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261024151012.1059683-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
On Sat, 24 Oct 2026 23:10:06 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> Five defects in the ocfs2 extended attribute code, plus one robustness
> measure that belongs with them, all on the paths that move entries
> between a block, a bucket and an index tree. They fall into two groups.
>
Thanks.
The series is a little awkward - [1/6] is "no functional change" hence
it's upstream-in-7.5-rc1 material.
The other 5 are cc:stable fixes, so they're upstream-in-7.4-rcX material.
That means splitting the series and it means upstreaming an untested
code combination - 2-5 haven't been tested without the presence of
[1/6].
I think I'll just cheat a bit. I'll keep all 6 together and I'll put
them in mm-nonmm-unstable for now. After Linus releases 7.4-rc1 I'll
move all 6 into mm-nonmm-hotfixes-unstable for upstreaming during the
7.4-rcX cycle.
I'll add
Fixes: e39baff18b85 ("ocfs2: use the stored hash when checking xattr bucket collision")
to [1/6] just to make things look better and to reduce the risk
associated with -stable running that untested code combination.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 15:10 Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] ocfs2: read the xattr entry hash before defragmenting the bucket Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] ocfs2: find the xattr entry again after defragmenting a bucket Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] ocfs2: find the xattr entry again after converting a block to " Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] ocfs2: do not read the entry array of an empty xattr bucket Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] ocfs2: do not index before the entry array when dividing an empty bucket Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] ocfs2: do not read the entry array of an empty xattr block Joseph Qi
2026-10-24 17:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261024103709.7ada16bbca6403787892cb5c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®