mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: hold truncate_lock in fat_write_failed()
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 17:24:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024172458.48c825a7a36a3802313a0ed3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021162105.62525-1-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>

On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:21:04 -0300 Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br> wrote:

> The current fat_write_failed() implementation calls into
> fat_truncate_blocks() without holding truncate_lock. Make it so it is
> held exclusive while truncating.
> 
> Fixes: 459f6ed3b8c7 ("fat: convert to use the new truncate convention.")
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>

Thanks.  My AI reviewbot said:

: Please expand the changelog to describe the failed/short extending write
: racing with FIBMAP. The mapper uses i_blocks, so it can walk beyond i_size
: while fat_write_failed() is cutting that part of the chain. That can
: produce a bogus "request beyond EOF" error and make the filesystem
: read-only with the default error policy.
: 
: Also, please change the Fixes attribution to 16fab2015099:
: "fat: permit to return phy block number by fibmap in fallocated region".
: That introduced the beyond-EOF FIBMAP lookup. Before it, the lookup was
: bounded by i_size, so the removed clusters were outside its range.
: 459f6ed3b8c7 introduced the helper, but not this failure mechanism.
: 
: I don't see a need to move the lock above truncate_pagecache(). Ordinary
: reads are bounded by i_size, and the cluster containing the partial EOF
: block is retained. FIBMAP is the case which needs this exclusion.
: 
: This looks like a stable candidate once validated and merged upstream.
: Please consider adding Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org. I checked the source
: and a reduced TLA+ model, but haven't built or runtime-tested the patch.

So I made some changes and ended up with the below.  Please check.

From: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Subject: fat: hold truncate_lock in fat_write_failed()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:21:04 -0300

The current fat_write_failed() implementation calls into
fat_truncate_blocks() without holding truncate_lock.

A failed or short extending write racing with FIBMAP can spuriously make a
FAT filesystem read-only.  FIBMAP bounds its lookup by i_blocks, so it can
walk allocated clusters beyond i_size while fat_write_failed() is removing
them.  If the chain is shortened during the walk, the mapper can report a
bogus "request beyond EOF" error, triggering the default read-only error
policy.  Hold truncate_lock for write around the block cleanup to
serialize it with _fat_bmap().

For comparison, fat_setattr() correctly holds truncate_lock during
truncation:

	down_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
	truncate_setsize(inode, attr->ia_size);
	fat_truncate_blocks(inode, attr->ia_size);
	up_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);

Make it so ->truncate_lock is held exclusive while truncating.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261021162105.62525-1-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br
Fixes: 16fab2015099 ("fat: permit to return phy block number by fibmap in fallocated region")
Fixes: 459f6ed3b8c7 ("fat: convert to use the new truncate convention.")
Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---

 fs/fat/inode.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/fat/inode.c~fat-hold-truncate_lock-in-fat_write_failed
+++ a/fs/fat/inode.c
@@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ static void fat_write_failed(struct addr
 
 	if (to > inode->i_size) {
 		truncate_pagecache(inode, inode->i_size);
+		down_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
 		fat_truncate_blocks(inode, inode->i_size);
+		up_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
 	}
 }
 
_


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-25  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21 16:21 Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-23  7:34 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-23 21:17   ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-23 23:46     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-24 19:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-24 21:39 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-10-24 22:30   ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-25  0:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-10-25  0:52   ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-25  3:57   ` OGAWA Hirofumi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261024172458.48c825a7a36a3802313a0ed3@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®