From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: hold truncate_lock in fat_write_failed()
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 17:24:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024172458.48c825a7a36a3802313a0ed3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021162105.62525-1-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:21:04 -0300 Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br> wrote:
> The current fat_write_failed() implementation calls into
> fat_truncate_blocks() without holding truncate_lock. Make it so it is
> held exclusive while truncating.
>
> Fixes: 459f6ed3b8c7 ("fat: convert to use the new truncate convention.")
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Thanks. My AI reviewbot said:
: Please expand the changelog to describe the failed/short extending write
: racing with FIBMAP. The mapper uses i_blocks, so it can walk beyond i_size
: while fat_write_failed() is cutting that part of the chain. That can
: produce a bogus "request beyond EOF" error and make the filesystem
: read-only with the default error policy.
:
: Also, please change the Fixes attribution to 16fab2015099:
: "fat: permit to return phy block number by fibmap in fallocated region".
: That introduced the beyond-EOF FIBMAP lookup. Before it, the lookup was
: bounded by i_size, so the removed clusters were outside its range.
: 459f6ed3b8c7 introduced the helper, but not this failure mechanism.
:
: I don't see a need to move the lock above truncate_pagecache(). Ordinary
: reads are bounded by i_size, and the cluster containing the partial EOF
: block is retained. FIBMAP is the case which needs this exclusion.
:
: This looks like a stable candidate once validated and merged upstream.
: Please consider adding Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org. I checked the source
: and a reduced TLA+ model, but haven't built or runtime-tested the patch.
So I made some changes and ended up with the below. Please check.
From: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Subject: fat: hold truncate_lock in fat_write_failed()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:21:04 -0300
The current fat_write_failed() implementation calls into
fat_truncate_blocks() without holding truncate_lock.
A failed or short extending write racing with FIBMAP can spuriously make a
FAT filesystem read-only. FIBMAP bounds its lookup by i_blocks, so it can
walk allocated clusters beyond i_size while fat_write_failed() is removing
them. If the chain is shortened during the walk, the mapper can report a
bogus "request beyond EOF" error, triggering the default read-only error
policy. Hold truncate_lock for write around the block cleanup to
serialize it with _fat_bmap().
For comparison, fat_setattr() correctly holds truncate_lock during
truncation:
down_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
truncate_setsize(inode, attr->ia_size);
fat_truncate_blocks(inode, attr->ia_size);
up_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
Make it so ->truncate_lock is held exclusive while truncating.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261021162105.62525-1-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br
Fixes: 16fab2015099 ("fat: permit to return phy block number by fibmap in fallocated region")
Fixes: 459f6ed3b8c7 ("fat: convert to use the new truncate convention.")
Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
fs/fat/inode.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/fat/inode.c~fat-hold-truncate_lock-in-fat_write_failed
+++ a/fs/fat/inode.c
@@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ static void fat_write_failed(struct addr
if (to > inode->i_size) {
truncate_pagecache(inode, inode->i_size);
+ down_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
fat_truncate_blocks(inode, inode->i_size);
+ up_write(&MSDOS_I(inode)->truncate_lock);
}
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-25 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 16:21 Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-23 7:34 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-23 21:17 ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-23 23:46 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-24 19:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-24 21:39 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-10-24 22:30 ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-25 0:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-10-25 0:52 ` Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-25 3:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261024172458.48c825a7a36a3802313a0ed3@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®