mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Arnav Kapoor" <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iio: proximity: sx9500: ignore event config writes that don't change state
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 23:26:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024175658.130546-1-kapoorarnav43@gmail.com> (raw)

sx9500_write_event_config() adjusts the channel and close/far user
counts on every write, even when the event is already in the requested
state. Writing 0 to a disabled event and then 1 leaves the counts at 0,
so the channel and its interrupts stay off while the event reads as
enabled. As channel_users[] is shared with raw reads, those can then
wait forever for a conversion. Writing 1 twice and then 0 has the
opposite effect.

Return early when the state doesn't change, as
sx_common_write_event_config() does.

Fixes: 4193c0f1d863 ("iio: driver for Semtech SX9500 proximity solution")
Signed-off-by: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
---
Compile-tested only (W=1); I don't have SX9500 hardware. Both write
sequences were checked with a userspace model of the user counting.

 drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
index dadce9b44227..26522b6c5a2d 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
@@ -548,6 +548,12 @@ static int sx9500_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
 
+	/* The user counts must only change when the state does. */
+	if (data->event_enabled[chan->channel] == state) {
+		ret = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	if (state) {
 		ret = sx9500_inc_chan_users(data, chan->channel);
 		if (ret < 0)

base-commit: 2ef6f5c4ee56e90c237c5f7687f09e635f7d30a9
-- 
2.53.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-10-24 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261024175658.130546-1-kapoorarnav43@gmail.com \
    --to=kapoorarnav43@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®