From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: igmp: report interface group allocation failure on join
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 12:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261025105743.GA126003@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179260356668.911829.6576504063198285556@tychen.cc>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 02:23:59AM +0900, Tianyi Chen wrote:
> setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) can return 0 while the group was never
> joined on the interface. __ip_mc_join_group() publishes the socket-side
> ip_mc_socklist in inet->mc_list before calling ____ip_mc_inc_group().
> That helper returns void, so when its kzalloc_obj() fails it returns
> without creating the interface-side ip_mc_list and the syscall still
> reports success. The socket then passes IP_MSFILTER but cannot receive
> the group's traffic: no IGMP report is generated, the group is absent
> from /proc/net/igmp, and the receive path drops the datagrams. Closing
> the socket also decrements the interface group for every published
> ip_mc_socklist, so it can remove a group that another socket joined.
>
> Make the helper return -ENOBUFS on allocation failure, call it before
> publishing iml, and free iml on failure. The object is charged with
> sock_kmalloc(), so sock_kfree_s() with the same size keeps
> sk_omem_alloc balanced; it was never published and has no source list
> yet, so no RCU free is needed. Successful joins still publish the fully
> initialized socket-side record after the interface group exists. RTNL
> serializes the writers, not the RCU readers; this ordering prevents a
> published socket membership without a device group.
>
> The legacy void wrapper keeps its best-effort behaviour: interface-up,
> init, bridge and tunnel callers cannot report an allocation failure. A
> query does not recreate a missing group; only a later successful
> inc_group call can. The silent failure predates the 2019 helper split
> (9fb20801dab4); there is no recent regression to tag with Fixes.
>
> Reproduced with fail-nth on v6.19 and v7.3-rc2. N=2 fails the helper's
> kzalloc_obj(): the original returns 0 with no interface group and 0/4
> multicast datagrams delivered; this change returns -ENOBUFS, leaves no
> socket or interface state, and a later join delivers 2/2. On the
> original, closing the half-joined socket also removes a second socket's
> group; the patched kernel keeps it. Normal joins, the existing-group
> users++ path and source-specific joins (allowed 2/2, filtered 0/2) are
> unchanged.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>
> ---
> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Looks like unnecessary churn. The failure is not realistic.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-25 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 17:23 Tianyi Chen
2026-10-21 17:28 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-22 5:59 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-25 10:57 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261025105743.GA126003@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hi@tychen.cc \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®