From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: validate ACPI object types in asus_acpi_get_sensor_info()
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 22:18:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261025221801.1dc4a7eb@jic23-hlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025180323.3641477-2-tristan@talencesecurity.com>
On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 18:03:23 +0000
Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com> wrote:
> asus_acpi_get_sensor_info() iterates through a nested ACPI package
> structure without checking types at either level. The outer object
> returned by acpi_evaluate_object() and each inner element must be
> validated as ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE before accessing their package.count
> and package.elements members.
>
> Add type checks at both levels of the package iteration.
>
> Fixes: a35c5d1aa96a ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Create mux clients for ACPI")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> index 460792ed27e03..81fe1d96365b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> @@ -57,11 +57,17 @@ static int asus_acpi_get_sensor_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> cpm = buffer.pointer;
> + if (cpm->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
> + kfree(buffer.pointer);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Similar to previous for this one. I think we can just used the
typed call to get it in the first place.
> for (i = 0; i < cpm->package.count; ++i) {
> union acpi_object *elem;
> int j;
>
> elem = &cpm->package.elements[i];
> + if (elem->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
> + continue;
> for (j = 0; j < elem->package.count; ++j) {
> union acpi_object *sub_elem;
Whilst here the ACPI_FREE() thing probably applies as it did
in the previous patch.
Jonathan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-25 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 18:03 [PATCH 1/2] iio: light: cm32181: validate ACPI object type in cm32181_acpi_get_cpm() Tristan Madani
2026-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: validate ACPI object types in asus_acpi_get_sensor_info() Tristan Madani
2026-10-25 22:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-10-25 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: light: cm32181: validate ACPI object type in cm32181_acpi_get_cpm() Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261025221801.1dc4a7eb@jic23-hlaptop \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®