From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] userns: don't drop the exec securebits
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:53:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026-work-securebits-userns-v1-1-b35473fa1a34@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026-work-securebits-userns-v1-0-b35473fa1a34@kernel.org>
SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE and SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE tell script
interpreters to only run what AT_EXECVE_CHECK allows and to refuse
interactive input. A service manager sets them together with their lock
bits so that nothing below it can turn them off again.
But set_cred_user_ns() resets all securebits to SECUREBITS_DEFAULT. So
any task that can create a user namespace sheds the locked exec bits
with a single unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) and joining one with setns() does
the same. The lock is pointless if anyone who may create a user
namespace can drop it, and that is pretty much everyone.
Resetting the other bits is fine. They are about how capabilities are
computed and a new user namespace starts out with a full set of
capabilities anyway. The exec bits grant nothing though. They are
restrictions a task placed on itself, just like no_new_privs which a
user namespace doesn't touch either. So keep them and their locks.
Reproducer:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Lock the exec securebits, then create a user namespace and look at them again. */
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#define SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE (1 << 8)
#define SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE_LOCKED (1 << 9)
#define SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE (1 << 10)
#define SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED (1 << 11)
int main(void)
{
int bits = SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE | SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE_LOCKED |
SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE | SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED;
if (prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, bits, 0, 0, 0)) {
perror("PR_SET_SECUREBITS");
return 1;
}
printf("before: 0x%x\n", prctl(PR_GET_SECUREBITS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
printf("clear locked bits: %s\n", prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, 0, 0, 0, 0) ? "refused" : "ALLOWED");
if (unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER)) {
perror("unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER)");
return 1;
}
printf("after unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER): 0x%x\n", prctl(PR_GET_SECUREBITS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
return 0;
}
On v7.1 this prints "before: 0xf00", "clear locked bits: refused" and
"after unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER): 0x0". With this patch the last line
reads 0xf00 as well.
Fixes: a0623b2a1d59 ("security: Add EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE and EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE securebits")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.14+
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/userspace-api/check_exec.rst | 4 ++++
kernel/user_namespace.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/check_exec.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/check_exec.rst
index 05dfe3b56f71..0904810e1d8d 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/check_exec.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/check_exec.rst
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ This secure bit may be set by user session managers, service managers,
container runtimes, sandboxer tools... Except for test environments, the
related ``SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED`` bit should also be set.
+Both secure bits and their locks are inherited across :manpage:`fork(2)` and
+:manpage:`execve(2)`, and they are kept when a task creates or joins a user
+namespace.
+
Here is the expected behavior for a script interpreter according to combination
of any exec securebits:
diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
index 50c374ed4687..cd748e1cbace 100644
--- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ static void set_cred_user_ns(struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *user_ns)
{
/* Start with the same capabilities as init but useless for doing
* anything as the capabilities are bound to the new user namespace.
+ * The exec securebits grant nothing, they are restrictions the task
+ * placed on itself. Keep them and their locks.
*/
- cred->securebits = SECUREBITS_DEFAULT;
+ cred->securebits = SECUREBITS_DEFAULT |
+ (cred->securebits & (SECURE_ALL_UNPRIVILEGED | SECURE_ALL_UNPRIVILEGED << 1));
cred->cap_inheritable = CAP_EMPTY_SET;
cred->cap_permitted = CAP_FULL_SET;
cred->cap_effective = CAP_FULL_SET;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 20:53 [PATCH 0/2] userns: keep " Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 20:53 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-10-26 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/exec: check that user namespaces " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026-work-securebits-userns-v1-1-b35473fa1a34@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®