mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] s390: Consistent usage of text_mutex
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:03:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026120329.1792436-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Other architectures serialize kernel text patching with text_mutex. s390
does not: __s390_kernel_write() relies on a private spinlock, and callers
partially depend on implicit exclusion (e.g. no kprobe can be set on a
jump label).

Make s390 consistent with other architectures:

- Patches 1-3 add text_mutex to the jump_label, ftrace and bpf text
  patching paths

- Patch 4 removes the redundant spinlock from __s390_kernel_write().
  CPU serialization, previously done implicitly, is now explicit via
  sync_core()

Thanks,
Heiko

Heiko Carstens (4):
  s390/jump_label: Serialize text patching with text_mutex
  s390/ftrace: Serialize text patching with text_mutex
  s390/bpf: Serialize text patching with text_mutex
  s390/maccess: Remove spinlock from __s390_kernel_write()

 arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c     |  9 +++++++++
 arch/s390/kernel/jump_label.c |  3 +++
 arch/s390/mm/maccess.c        |  9 ++++-----
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-26 12:03 Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-10-26 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/jump_label: Serialize text patching with text_mutex Heiko Carstens
2026-10-26 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/ftrace: " Heiko Carstens
2026-10-26 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/bpf: " Heiko Carstens
2026-10-26 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/maccess: Remove spinlock from __s390_kernel_write() Heiko Carstens
2026-10-26 13:04   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-10-26 14:19     ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261026120329.1792436-1-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®