From: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
To: mkp@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
mlombard@redhat.com, michael.christie@oracle.com,
bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] scsi: target: iscsi: Complete an aborted WRITE when a new R2T would be sent
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:43:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026124344.745124-3-loberman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026124344.745124-1-loberman@redhat.com>
iscsit_check_dataout_payload() hands a command to iscsit_get_dataout() to
request the next burst whenever iscsit_check_post_dataout() returns
DATAOUT_SEND_R2T, without checking CMD_T_ABORTED first.
If a TMR aborted the command while the burst that just finished was in
flight, no further DataOut will arrive: the initiator is about to be told
the command was aborted. The CMD_T_ABORTED handling in
__iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() does not cover this, because it only runs
for DataOut PDUs belonging to R2Ts that were already issued, and
outstanding_r2ts has already been decremented to zero for the burst that
completed. The command is left in TRANSPORT_WRITE_PENDING with nothing to
complete it.
Complete it here instead, through iscsit_complete_aborted_cmd() so that
the completion is claimed. target_complete_cmd() on a command that
already has CMD_T_ABORTED set goes to target_cmd_interrupted(), which
queues target_abort_work and returns without setting CMD_T_COMPLETE or
changing t_state. The command therefore stays in TRANSPORT_WRITE_PENDING
and on conn_cmd_list until target_abort_work reaches
iscsit_aborted_task(), and a connection drop in that window would let
iscsit_release_commands_from_conn() complete it a second time. Guard on
outstanding_r2ts so that with MaxOutstandingR2T > 1 the completion is
still left to the last R2T to drain in __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr().
Signed-off-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
This window was never observed in the field: instrumented kernels on two
hosts recorded no completions at this site across 300 reset cycles, and
the reproducer that triggered patch 1 never reached it. It is closed by
code inspection, for symmetry with the other paths that can leave an
aborted WRITE_PENDING command stranded.
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
index aab9237..3dad7f6 100644
--- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
+++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
@@ -1669,6 +1669,22 @@ iscsit_check_dataout_payload(struct iscsit_cmd *cmd, struct iscsi_data *hdr,
if ((rc == DATAOUT_NORMAL) || (rc == DATAOUT_WITHIN_COMMAND_RECOVERY))
return 0;
else if (rc == DATAOUT_SEND_R2T) {
+ /*
+ * A new R2T would never be answered for an aborted command.
+ * The CMD_T_ABORTED handling in __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr()
+ * does not cover this: it only runs for DataOut PDUs
+ * belonging to R2Ts that were already issued, and
+ * iscsit_dataout_update_r2t() has already decremented
+ * outstanding_r2ts for the burst that just finished. Guard
+ * on outstanding_r2ts so that with MaxOutstandingR2T > 1 the
+ * completion is still left to the last R2T to drain.
+ */
+ if (cmd->se_cmd.transport_state & CMD_T_ABORTED) {
+ if (cmd->outstanding_r2ts < 1)
+ iscsit_complete_aborted_cmd(cmd);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
iscsit_set_dataout_sequence_values(cmd);
conn->conn_transport->iscsit_get_dataout(conn, cmd, false);
} else if (rc == DATAOUT_SEND_TO_TRANSPORT) {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 12:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] scsi: target: iscsi: fix stalled and doubly completed aborted WRITEs Laurence Oberman
2026-10-26 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] scsi: target: iscsi: Complete an aborted WRITE stuck before the first R2T Laurence Oberman
2026-10-26 12:43 ` Laurence Oberman [this message]
2026-10-26 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] scsi: target: iscsi: Claim the completion in __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() Laurence Oberman
2026-10-26 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] scsi: target: iscsi: Claim the completion on the DataOut submit path Laurence Oberman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026124344.745124-3-loberman@redhat.com \
--to=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®