From: Aurelien DESBRIERES <aurelien@hackers.camp>
To: jack@suse.cz
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aurelien.desbrieres@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] buffer: warn when a buffer is attached to a second mmb
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 22:36:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026213626.301480-1-aurelien@hackers.camp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q472nkbfcfdumbxm3cebfnnmueqyl6uhhnper5t6e2cxajpvtu@7prjjo7k6ia3>
mmb_mark_buffer_dirty() tracks a buffer on one mapping_metadata_bhs at
most. The per-mmb lock does not protect a buffer that changes lists,
and mmb_sync() clears b_mmb for a moment under its own lock, so a
filesystem that attaches a buffer shared by several inodes to each
inode's list in turn corrupts b_assoc_buffers eventually. With
CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST the list_del is refused and mmb_sync() spins on a
list that never empties, holding mmb->lock: seen with beamfs under
dbench (xfstests generic/241) as list_del corruption, a soft lockup and
a node lost to the OOM killer, with nothing naming the filesystem.
Warn once when a buffer already tracked by another mmb is marked dirty
through a second one, so that the misuse is named at its first
occurrence rather than at the corruption it leads to. A corrupted
volume in which two inodes claim the same block reaches this as well;
the cmpxchg below keeps the lists sound in that case, and the warning
then says which filesystem believed its block map.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/q472nkbfcfdumbxm3cebfnnmueqyl6uhhnper5t6e2cxajpvtu@7prjjo7k6ia3/
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aurelien DESBRIERES <aurelien@hackers.camp>
---
Tested on vfs.all with beamfs, x86_64 guest, 4 CPUs:
- the module as it was before our fix, attaching the shared bitmap
block to each allocating inode's list in turn: the warning fires at
boot, 8.6 s in, on the first truncate that frees blocks of a file
another inode had allocated, long before the dbench run that used
to corrupt the list:
WARNING: fs/buffer.c:639 at mmb_mark_buffer_dirty+0x46/0xd0, CPU#3: S01hostname-cmd/111
beamfs_write_bitmap_block+0x191/0x1c0
beamfs_inline_free_blocks_from+0x64/0x390
beamfs_inline_setattr+0x127/0x4c0
notify_change+0x33b/0x520
do_truncate+0xbf/0xf0
path_openat+0x8c1/0xaa0
- the module with the shared buffers on one superblock list: no
warning at boot or under the filesystem's own tests.
fs/buffer.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 1dc933ba6925..e503a7ed9c37 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -627,6 +627,16 @@ void write_boundary_block(struct block_device *bdev,
void mmb_mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh,
struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb)
{
+ struct mapping_metadata_bhs *cur = READ_ONCE(bh->b_mmb);
+
+ /*
+ * A buffer is tracked by one mmb at most. The per-mmb lock does
+ * not cover a buffer that changes lists, and mmb_sync() clears
+ * b_mmb for a moment under its own lock, so a filesystem that
+ * attaches a buffer to a second mmb corrupts b_assoc_buffers
+ * sooner or later. Name it here, before the lists do.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cur && cur != mmb);
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
if (!bh->b_mmb) {
spin_lock(&mmb->lock);
base-commit: 2c3ba1f1cb416b81d617b92a24a4bcaa48d574e3
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 17:06 mmb_sync: b_mmb NULL window races mmb_mark_buffer_dirty Aurelien DESBRIERES
2026-10-26 13:08 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-26 20:56 ` Aurelien DESBRIERES
2026-10-26 21:36 ` Aurelien DESBRIERES [this message]
2026-10-26 21:54 ` [PATCH] buffer: warn when a buffer is attached to a second mmb Jan Kara
2026-10-27 8:46 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026213626.301480-1-aurelien@hackers.camp \
--to=aurelien@hackers.camp \
--cc=aurelien.desbrieres@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®