From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793137096; b=DhsqYr2VmOTurbqiabetqEeqpphQNPak+UHhIEQ3EkfgAascnivuOf4SLKxZmb72MQVm ohVxngkAtzBKrqE3PYiQv4SNXWt6HhPucRiU1R3GbAoOhcbnvdAZiXftxqDkug/D49rgA g1APP9Qe0W3hAsPm7ncieEANDuh6xxSJqCNo7ZY62bkso4Y/OT7RIwzrlvdMvsAhB1ezA iUZVkA5sd6/dh+m8Uv9uQLpnsiqsoLBrBiXMVDk82rz5kyqCDhwBd3xO//xeg+rN7g9Op Wz+3Ohk48MnfJS9jey/rj7bBgL5+ezn0OZKbRwmcJeZ3psyaUcbnr/ouU5aeooVC0BQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793137096; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=PqWOiY9VRjCy+ga6/7GbQl1u6l3t01EavkGObI2f+Ig=; b=Jt9/3KZmcKu+GA3waCl4B25/XQtcsJ/gceWIOnwLZxa5VgyVs3pHkGq8s0hKOoIqR7U3 SKJ8lJ2isV2G1A7B0xvAUTyBWJjN5gCeZ/jLB8vakmQ6/YqeHLuGnR6U1vLMO7zisOaTQ 1074bL+/mz4g0cx+HdUSSuAwQrgcG1SrCnByOo0je8xTOSLcq0MYIS78LXJOrmQCsDk4K yRDsvBvwziS+85KupE6G7kJ+mOURDIS5yNmqb9EUtdhAyvx9xGDRf2z/JnQIeECyTGanB jR2A3SJxrgIW80FFmZ2iVE08dpG/T2jy8hXHy8gPB0YaWSTHqgvwnxAY23x3AnozfNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ZMSvuu8R; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E06606A31A; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 21:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ZMSvuu8R Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFD321F01825; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 21:38:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793137095; bh=PqWOiY9VRjCy+ga6/7GbQl1u6l3t01EavkGObI2f+Ig=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZMSvuu8RHqJWTLlwmAHIawhTchfRw3MS1sXHlShygeuzsGQaRk+MN989eI4yq7umH 2ZOPo6NYGU4vEz8qJ+41hTqUNkMhDkEwhnYBw2LtDwQgnZcHm42E/jf+lmChXecF6+ BxDILkBYLK6Ao1VYiZB0Eowh4S8P82/nLrrMnbDxmlx89Ew9KeWulkEoPaRTK7x1o1 wlKXzc1+zACJO2ncRqt9gu9mteHISBHiYDVWgBWARsFmUQxCUvrW4WT1tq6EOmtomH 9dDAU5OoMnaI/z0hL38HmNwT5C+BOGbNDKPLFcQdtwosCDFKMXNXAo3V+rlLspU/TT Jre28PuVkBwug== Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:38:14 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Hangbin Liu Cc: Ido Schimmel , Gabriel Goller , David Ahern , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Nicolas Dichtel , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: Add NETCONFA_FORCE_FORWARDING to netconf messages Message-ID: <20261027143814.335587dd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20261023-ipv6_add_netconfa-v1-1-94d14b07d621@proxmox.com> <20261025131102.GA184152@shredder> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:31:13 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > This seems to fall under the "Not a regression, not critical" category > > [1], so can wait for net-next. Agreed. I think this is more of a "missing functionality is not a bug", even. > One question about this rule. For "not critical" fixes, should I make that > judgment myself and post to net-next? Or should I send them to net and let > the maintainers decide whether the fix should go into net or net-next? Post fixes for net, let maintainers decide.