mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Crofts <crofts@kernel.org>
To: Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu <Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com>
Cc: "Sergiu Cuciurean" <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: add ltc2387 driver
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 15:37:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261027153713.000066ce@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027134409.76824-3-Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com>

On Tue, 27 Oct 2026 15:44:09 +0200
Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu <Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com> wrote:

> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
> 
> Add a driver for the LTC2387-16/18 and the ADAQ23875/23876/23878.

Hi, some comments from me. Additionally, please check out what
Sashiko says:

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027134409.76824-1-Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu%40analog.com


> The driver generates CNV and the gated data clock with two PWM
> channels, timed against the reference clock to meet t_FIRSTCLK, and
> gets sample data through the IIO backend framework from the AXI ADC
> core. It supports one-lane and two-lane output and reports the
> sampling frequency the PWMs produce after rounding to whole reference
> clock cycles. in_voltage_scale is referred to the analog input, so on
> the ADAQ parts it is divided by the front-end gain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu <Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu <Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5

Drop this tag, it has been deprecated.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2387.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2387.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c236b99baa4a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2387.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,482 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Linear Technology LTC2387 ADC driver
> + *
> + * Copyright 2022 - 2026 Analog Devices Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/backend.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>

Better to have the iio specific headers separately after the generic
linux headers.

> +#include <linux/kernel.h>

No, do not use this header for new drivers. Use the IWYU principle when
deciding what to include.

> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>

Drop this header, it's included by platform_device.h

+ you're missing additional headers, e.g. types.h

> +
> +#define LTC2387_VREF		4096
> +#define LTC2387_T_CNVH		8
> +
> +/*
> + * Minimal value for t_{FIRSTCLK} according to
> + * https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/238718fa.pdf
> + * is 65 ns. Add some slack because there is some rounding involved in the PWM
> + * driver. With the PWM driver rounding to the nearest possible value, targeting
> + * 70 ns works for input clk rates >= 100 MHz.
> + */
> +#define LTC2387_T_FIRSTCLK_NS	70
> +
> +#define KHz 1000

We have units.h for this.

> +#define MHz (1000 * KHz)
> +
> +#define LTC2378_MULTIPLE_CHAN(_idx, _storagebits, _realbits, _shift)	\
> +	{								\
> +		.type = IIO_VOLTAGE,					\
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),\
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),\
> +		.indexed = 1,						\
> +		.channel = _idx,					\
> +		.scan_index = _idx,					\
> +		.scan_type = {						\
> +			.sign = 's',					\
> +			.storagebits = _storagebits,			\
> +			.realbits = _realbits,				\
> +			.shift = _shift,				\
> +		},							\
> +	}
> +

...

> +struct ltc2387_dev {
> +	const struct ltc2387_info *device_info;
> +	enum ltc2387_lane_modes lane_mode;
> +	unsigned long ref_clk_rate;
> +	struct iio_backend *back;
> +	struct pwm_device *clk_gate;
> +	struct regulator *vref;
> +	struct pwm_device *cnv;
> +	struct clk *ref_clk;
> +
> +	unsigned int vref_mv;

_mV

> +	u32 sampling_freq;
> +	u32 gain_milli;
> +};
> +
> +static int ltc2387_set_sampling_freq(struct ltc2387_dev *ltc, int freq)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long ref_clk_period_ns;
> +	struct pwm_waveform clk_gate_wf = { }, cnv_wf = { };

Reverse xmas tree please.

> +	unsigned long long period_cycles;
> +	int ret, clk_en_time;
> +	u32 rem;
> +
> +	if (freq <= 0 || freq > ltc->ref_clk_rate)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ref_clk_period_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, ltc->ref_clk_rate);
> +
> +	cnv_wf.duty_length_ns = ref_clk_period_ns;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The goal here is that the PWM is configured with a minimal period not
> +	 * less than 1 / freq (with freq measured in Hz).
> +	 *
> +	 * When a period P (measured in ns) is passed to pwm_apply_state(), the
> +	 * actually implemented period is:
> +	 *
> +	 *      round_down(P * R / NSEC_PER_SEC) / R
> +	 *
> +	 * (measured in s) with R = ltc->ref_clk_rate. So we have:
> +	 *
> +	 *        round_down(P * R / NSEC_PER_SEC) / R ≥ 1 / freq
> +	 *      ⟺ round_down(P * R / NSEC_PER_SEC) ≥ R / freq

Ehhh, not really sure about these non-standard characters in the comments.
Had to check lore to see what this renders to. Wouldn't it be easier to use
a trigraph <=>? Same for the digraph stuff you have.

> +	 *
> +	 * With the LHS being integer this is equivalent to:
> +	 *
> +	 *        round_down(P * R / NSEC_PER_SEC) ≥ round_up(R / freq)
> +	 *      ⟺ P * R / NSEC_PER_SEC ≥ round_up(R / freq)
> +	 *      ⟺ P ≥ round_up(R / freq) * NSEC_PER_SEC / R
> +	 */
> +
> +	cnv_wf.period_length_ns =
> +		div_u64_rem((u64)DIV_ROUND_UP(ltc->ref_clk_rate, freq) * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +			    ltc->ref_clk_rate, &rem);
> +	if (rem)
> +		cnv_wf.period_length_ns += 1;
> +
> +	/* Gate the active period of the clock (see page 10-13 for both LTC's) */
> +	if (ltc->lane_mode == TWO_LANES)
> +		clk_en_time = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ltc->device_info->resolution, 4);
> +	else
> +		clk_en_time = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ltc->device_info->resolution, 2);
> +
> +	clk_gate_wf.duty_length_ns = ref_clk_period_ns * clk_en_time;
> +	clk_gate_wf.duty_offset_ns = LTC2387_T_FIRSTCLK_NS;
> +
> +	if (cnv_wf.period_length_ns < clk_gate_wf.duty_length_ns)
> +		cnv_wf.period_length_ns = clk_gate_wf.duty_length_ns + ref_clk_period_ns;
> +
> +	clk_gate_wf.period_length_ns = cnv_wf.period_length_ns;
> +
> +	if (clk_gate_wf.duty_offset_ns >= clk_gate_wf.period_length_ns)
> +		div64_u64_rem(clk_gate_wf.duty_offset_ns,
> +			      clk_gate_wf.period_length_ns,
> +			      &clk_gate_wf.duty_offset_ns);
> +
> +	ret = pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(ltc->cnv, &cnv_wf, false);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(ltc->clk_gate, &clk_gate_wf, false);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	period_cycles = mul_u64_u32_div(cnv_wf.period_length_ns,
> +					ltc->ref_clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	if (!period_cycles)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ltc->sampling_freq = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ltc->ref_clk_rate,
> +						   period_cycles);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc2387_setup(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> +	struct ltc2387_dev *ltc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent;
> +
> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "adi,use-two-lanes"))
> +		ltc->lane_mode = TWO_LANES;
> +
> +	return ltc2387_set_sampling_freq(ltc, 15 * MHz);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc2387_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +			    const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> +			    int *val, int *val2, long info)
> +{
> +	struct ltc2387_dev *ltc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	switch (info) {
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		*val = ltc->sampling_freq;
> +		return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +		/* Referred to the SMA input, so divided by the front-end gain. */
> +		*val = ltc->vref_mv * 2 * 1000;

vref_mv * 2 * MILLI;

> +		*val2 = ltc->gain_milli << chan->scan_type.realbits;
> +		return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc2387_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +			     struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> +			     int val, int val2, long info)
> +{
> +	struct ltc2387_dev *ltc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +

Probably add a mutex here to protect writing, ideally in guard() form.

> +	switch (info) {
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		return ltc2387_set_sampling_freq(ltc, val);
> +
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void ltc2387_pwm_disable(void *data)
> +{
> +	pwm_disable(data);
> +}
> +
> +static void ltc2387_regulator_disable(void *data)
> +{
> +	regulator_disable(data);
> +}
> +
> +static void ltc2387_clk_disable(void *data)
> +{
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(data);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info ltc2387_info = {
> +	.read_raw = ltc2387_read_raw,
> +	.write_raw = ltc2387_write_raw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ltc2387_of_match[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "lltc,ltc2387-16",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_LTC2387_16]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "lltc,ltc2387-16-x4",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_LTC2387_16_X4]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "lltc,ltc2387-18",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_LTC2387_18]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "lltc,ltc2387-18-x4",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_LTC2387_18_X4]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "adi,adaq23875",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_ADAQ23875]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "adi,adaq23876",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_ADAQ23876]
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "adi,adaq23878",
> +		.data = &ltc2387_infos[ID_ADAQ23878]
> +	},
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc2387_of_match);

Have the device tables after the probe() function.

> +
> +static int ltc2387_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev			*indio_dev;
> +	struct ltc2387_dev		*ltc;
> +	int				ret;

Maybe unify the style you define variables? (aligned vs. non-aligned).

> +
> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ltc));
> +	if (!indio_dev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ltc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	ltc->vref = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vref");
> +	if (!IS_ERR(ltc->vref)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(ltc->vref);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't enable vref regulator\n");

dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err()

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		ret = regulator_get_voltage(ltc->vref);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ltc->vref_mv = ret / 1000;

ret / (MICRO / MILLI)

> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> +					       ltc2387_regulator_disable,
> +					       ltc->vref);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(ltc->vref) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(ltc->vref);
> +
> +		ltc->vref_mv = LTC2387_VREF; /* Internal vref is used */
> +	}
> +
> +	ltc->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ltc->ref_clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ltc->ref_clk);
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(ltc->ref_clk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, ltc2387_clk_disable,
> +				       ltc->ref_clk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

+ blank line.

> +	ltc->ref_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(ltc->ref_clk);
> +
> +	ltc->clk_gate = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, "clk_gate");
> +	if (IS_ERR(ltc->clk_gate))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ltc->clk_gate);
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, ltc2387_pwm_disable,
> +				       ltc->clk_gate);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ltc->cnv = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, "cnv");
> +	if (IS_ERR(ltc->cnv))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ltc->cnv);
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, ltc2387_pwm_disable,
> +				       ltc->cnv);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ltc->device_info = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!ltc->device_info)
> +		return -EINVAL;

return -ENODATA;

> +
> +	ltc->gain_milli = ltc->device_info->default_gain_milli;
> +	device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "adi,gain-milli", &ltc->gain_milli);
> +	if (!ltc->gain_milli)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL,
> +				     "adi,gain-milli must be nonzero\n");
> +
> +	indio_dev->channels = ltc->device_info->channels;
> +	indio_dev->num_channels = ltc->device_info->num_channels;
> +	indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +	indio_dev->name = ltc->device_info->name;
> +	indio_dev->info = &ltc2387_info;
> +
> +	ltc->back = devm_iio_backend_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ltc->back))
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(ltc->back),
> +				     "failed to get IIO backend\n");
> +
> +	ret = devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(&pdev->dev, ltc->back, indio_dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_iio_backend_enable(&pdev->dev, ltc->back);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* axi_ltc2387 has a single capture channel carrying every scan element. */
> +	ret = iio_backend_chan_enable(ltc->back, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = ltc2387_setup(indio_dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "\nltc2387 setup failed\n");

Why the additional \n at the beginning.
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ltc2387_driver = {
> +	.probe          = ltc2387_probe,
> +	.driver         = {
> +		.name   = "ltc2387",
> +		.of_match_table = ltc2387_of_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(ltc2387_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linear Technology LTC2387 ADC");

The description should be the same as what's in the Kconfig tristate entry.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("IIO_BACKEND");



-- 
Kind regards,
Joshua Crofts

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-27 13:44 [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: add LTC2387 and ADAQ2387x support Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu
2026-10-27 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add lltc,ltc2387 Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu
2026-10-27 18:28   ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-27 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: add ltc2387 driver Nicolae-Daniel Deaconescu
2026-10-27 14:37   ` Joshua Crofts [this message]
2026-10-28  2:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-27 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: add LTC2387 and ADAQ2387x support Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261027153713.000066ce@kernel.org \
    --to=crofts@kernel.org \
    --cc=Nicolae-daniel.Deaconescu@analog.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®