mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Yang <yangfeng59949@163.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
	emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds btf->types write for split BTF
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:19:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028031933.277550-1-yangfeng59949@163.com> (raw)

From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>

btf_add_type() stores the types of a BTF in btf->types[], which can hold at
most BTF_MAX_TYPE entries.  The types of a split BTF get IDs start_id ..
start_id + nr_types - 1, so only BTF_MAX_TYPE - start_id of them fit, but
neither the limit check nor the size used to grow the array accounts for
start_id: the check is an equality test against BTF_MAX_TYPE
('start_id + btf->types_size == BTF_MAX_TYPE') and the new size is clamped
to BTF_MAX_TYPE.

The check therefore only fires if the array happens to grow to exactly
BTF_MAX_TYPE - start_id entries.  Otherwise, if the module has more than
BTF_MAX_TYPE types, the array is filled up to BTF_MAX_TYPE entries.  The
next type that needs to be added reallocates the array to the same size,
after which btf->types_size no longer equals btf->nr_types and the growth
path is not taken anymore, so every following type is written past the end
of the array:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90006200000
  RIP: 0010:btf_add_type+0x74/0x270
  Call Trace:
   btf_check_all_metas
   btf_parse_module

Bound both the array size and the limit check by BTF_MAX_TYPE - start_id.
Base BTF (start_id == 0) is unaffected.

Fixes: 951bb64621b8 ("bpf: Add in-kernel split BTF support")
Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
v3: Simplify the commit message. Thanks, Ihor Solodrai.
Remove the redundant btf->start_id >= BTF_MAX_TYPE check introduced in v2.
When entering this branch, types_size == nr_types >= 0, so the condition
start_id >= BTF_MAX_TYPE is already covered by the second check.
start_id comes from btf_nr_types (base_btf), and the base BTF is subject
to the same bounds check, so start_id <= BTF_MAX_TYPE.
Thus there is no u32 wrap-around for start_id + type_size,
and max_size cannot underflow.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026073654.840705-1-yangfeng59949@163.com/
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 7ed1ff71a089..1be30487a2fa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -1752,15 +1752,16 @@ static int btf_add_type(struct btf_verifier_env *env, struct btf_type *t)
 		/* Expand 'types' array */
 
 		struct btf_type **new_types;
-		u32 expand_by, new_size;
+		u32 expand_by, new_size, max_size;
 
-		if (btf->start_id + btf->types_size == BTF_MAX_TYPE) {
+		if (btf->start_id + btf->types_size >= BTF_MAX_TYPE) {
 			btf_verifier_log(env, "Exceeded max num of types");
 			return -E2BIG;
 		}
 
+		max_size = BTF_MAX_TYPE - btf->start_id;
 		expand_by = max_t(u32, btf->types_size >> 2, 16);
-		new_size = min_t(u32, BTF_MAX_TYPE,
+		new_size = min_t(u32, max_size,
 				 btf->types_size + expand_by);
 
 		new_types = kvzalloc_objs(*new_types, new_size,
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28  3:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  3:19 Feng Yang [this message]
2026-10-28  3:23 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-28  4:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261028031933.277550-1-yangfeng59949@163.com \
    --to=yangfeng59949@163.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®